Skip to content

Conversation

@dakrone
Copy link
Member

@dakrone dakrone commented Jan 6, 2020

This commits makes the "init" ILM step retryable. It also adds a test
where an index is created with a non-parsable index name and then fails.

Related to #48183

This commits makes the "init" ILM step retryable. It also adds a test
where an index is created with a non-parsable index name and then fails.

Related to elastic#48183
@dakrone dakrone added >enhancement :Data Management/ILM+SLM Index and Snapshot lifecycle management v8.0.0 v7.6.0 labels Jan 6, 2020
@dakrone dakrone requested a review from andreidan January 6, 2020 21:37
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-core-features (:Core/Features/ILM+SLM)

Copy link
Contributor

@andreidan andreidan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks for working on this @dakrone, LGTM

@dakrone dakrone merged commit 919b297 into elastic:master Jan 8, 2020
@dakrone dakrone deleted the ilm-make-init-step-retryable branch January 8, 2020 19:24
dakrone added a commit to dakrone/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request Jan 8, 2020
This commits makes the "init" ILM step retryable. It also adds a test
where an index is created with a non-parsable index name and then fails.

Related to elastic#48183
dakrone added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 8, 2020
This commits makes the "init" ILM step retryable. It also adds a test
where an index is created with a non-parsable index name and then fails.

Related to #48183
SivagurunathanV pushed a commit to SivagurunathanV/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request Jan 23, 2020
This commits makes the "init" ILM step retryable. It also adds a test
where an index is created with a non-parsable index name and then fails.

Related to elastic#48183
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants