Skip to content

Conversation

@andreidan
Copy link
Contributor

The open and close follower steps didn't check if the index is open,
closed respectively, before executing the open/close request.
This changes the steps to check the index state and only perform the
open/close operation if the index is not already open/closed.

This avoids a rather expensive operation and improves the resiliency of
the steps as a possible point of failure is avoided.

The open and close follower steps didn't check if the index is open,
closed respectively, before executing the open/close request.
This changes the steps to check the index state and only perform the
open/close operation if the index is not already open/closed.
@andreidan andreidan added >enhancement :Data Management/ILM+SLM Index and Snapshot lifecycle management v8.0.0 v7.6.0 labels Oct 29, 2019
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-core-features (:Core/Features/ILM+SLM)

Copy link
Member

@dakrone dakrone left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@andreidan andreidan merged commit 7923145 into elastic:master Oct 29, 2019
andreidan added a commit to andreidan/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request Oct 29, 2019
The open and close follower steps didn't check if the index is open,
closed respectively, before executing the open/close request.
This changes the steps to check the index state and only perform the
open/close operation if the index is not already open/closed.
andreidan added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 29, 2019
The open and close follower steps didn't check if the index is open,
closed respectively, before executing the open/close request.
This changes the steps to check the index state and only perform the
open/close operation if the index is not already open/closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants