Skip to content

Conversation

@dakrone
Copy link
Member

@dakrone dakrone commented Jul 16, 2019

This adds the index's age to the ILM explain output, for example:

{
  "indices" : {
    "ilm-000001" : {
      "index" : "ilm-000001",
      "managed" : true,
      "policy" : "full-lifecycle",
      "lifecycle_date" : "2019-07-16T19:48:22.294Z",
      "lifecycle_date_millis" : 1563306502294,
      "age" : "1.34m",
      "phase" : "hot",
      "phase_time" : "2019-07-16T19:48:22.487Z",
      ... etc ...
    }
  }
}

This age can be used to tell when ILM will transition the index to the
next phase, based on that phase's min_age.

Resolves #38988

This adds the index's age to the ILM explain output, for example:

```
{
  "indices" : {
    "ilm-000001" : {
      "index" : "ilm-000001",
      "managed" : true,
      "policy" : "full-lifecycle",
      "lifecycle_date" : "2019-07-16T19:48:22.294Z",
      "lifecycle_date_millis" : 1563306502294,
      "age" : "1.34m",
      "phase" : "hot",
      "phase_time" : "2019-07-16T19:48:22.487Z",
      ... etc ...
    }
  }
}
```

This age can be used to tell when ILM will transition the index to the
next phase, based on that phase's `min_age`.

Resolves elastic#38988
@dakrone dakrone added >enhancement :Data Management/ILM+SLM Index and Snapshot lifecycle management v8.0.0 v7.4.0 labels Jul 16, 2019
@dakrone dakrone requested a review from gwbrown July 16, 2019 21:13
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-core-features

@dakrone
Copy link
Member Author

dakrone commented Jul 17, 2019

@elasticmachine run elasticsearch-ci/2

@dakrone
Copy link
Member Author

dakrone commented Jul 18, 2019

@elasticmachine test this

@dakrone
Copy link
Member Author

dakrone commented Jul 18, 2019

@elasticmachine retest this please

@jakelandis jakelandis requested a review from jbaiera July 18, 2019 15:02
@dakrone
Copy link
Member Author

dakrone commented Jul 18, 2019

@elasticmachine update branch

@dakrone
Copy link
Member Author

dakrone commented Jul 18, 2019

@elasticmachine run elasticsearch-ci/2

@dakrone
Copy link
Member Author

dakrone commented Jul 18, 2019

@elasticmachine run elasticsearch-ci/packaging-sample

Copy link
Member

@jbaiera jbaiera left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@dakrone dakrone merged commit fd822b4 into elastic:master Jul 18, 2019
dakrone added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 18, 2019
* Expose index age in ILM explain output

This adds the index's age to the ILM explain output, for example:

```
{
  "indices" : {
    "ilm-000001" : {
      "index" : "ilm-000001",
      "managed" : true,
      "policy" : "full-lifecycle",
      "lifecycle_date" : "2019-07-16T19:48:22.294Z",
      "lifecycle_date_millis" : 1563306502294,
      "age" : "1.34m",
      "phase" : "hot",
      "phase_time" : "2019-07-16T19:48:22.487Z",
      ... etc ...
    }
  }
}
```

This age can be used to tell when ILM will transition the index to the
next phase, based on that phase's `min_age`.

Resolves #38988

* Expose age in getters and in HLRC
@dakrone dakrone deleted the ilm-expose-index-age branch July 18, 2019 21:59
Mpdreamz added a commit to elastic/elasticsearch-net that referenced this pull request Oct 14, 2019
russcam pushed a commit to elastic/elasticsearch-net that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2019
russcam pushed a commit to elastic/elasticsearch-net that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2019
Mpdreamz added a commit to elastic/elasticsearch-net that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

ILM: Including "aging" information in Explain lifecycle API

4 participants