Skip to content

Conversation

@jdconrad
Copy link
Contributor

@jdconrad jdconrad commented Oct 9, 2018

Currently, a class must be whitelisted separately to allow a statically imported method to also be whitelisted. This removes the extraneous check to see if the class for a statically imported method is already whitelisted, so a statically imported method can be whitelisted independently.

@jdconrad jdconrad added >bug :Core/Infra/Scripting Scripting abstractions, Painless, and Mustache v7.0.0 v6.5.0 labels Oct 9, 2018
@jdconrad jdconrad requested a review from rjernst October 9, 2018 19:44
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-core-infra

Copy link
Member

@rjernst rjernst left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Lgtm

@jdconrad
Copy link
Contributor Author

jdconrad commented Oct 9, 2018

@rjernst Thanks for the review! Will commit as soon as CI passes.

@jdconrad jdconrad merged commit 4270085 into elastic:master Oct 10, 2018
jdconrad added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 10, 2018
…#34370)

This removes the extraneous check to see if the class for a statically imported 
method is already whitelisted, so a statically imported method can be whitelisted
independently.
@jdconrad jdconrad mentioned this pull request Oct 16, 2018
23 tasks
kcm pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 30, 2018
…#34370)

This removes the extraneous check to see if the class for a statically imported 
method is already whitelisted, so a statically imported method can be whitelisted
independently.
@jimczi jimczi added v7.0.0-beta1 and removed v7.0.0 labels Feb 7, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

>bug :Core/Infra/Scripting Scripting abstractions, Painless, and Mustache v6.5.0 v7.0.0-beta1

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants