-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25.6k
HLRC: ML PUT Calendar #33362
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
HLRC: ML PUT Calendar #33362
Conversation
|
Pinging @elastic/es-core-infra |
|
Pinging @elastic/ml-core |
696b67e to
50ba8aa
Compare
|
retest this please |
benwtrent
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Some minor things and consistencies.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would think that the this.jobIds should be made immutable here, or at least create a new ArrayList from the passed in list.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good point
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For consistency, please use obj == null || getClass() != obj.getClass() for equality check.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
See comment on the Calender#equals method.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This should be true. This is just a wrapper for the Calendar class whose parser ignores unknown fields.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This should be true
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
true as well here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why is this java-rest-high-snapshot... ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good catch. I based this on another doc which in turn must have been copied form the snapshot restore API. There were a a number of ML docs that had the same mis-naming
a3d49b5 to
c8ff4ec
Compare
dimitris-athanasiou
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
c8ff4ec to
647b817
Compare
* master: Add script to cache dependencies (elastic#33726) [DOCS] Moves security reference to docs folder (elastic#33643) Cleanup assertions in global checkpoint listeners (elastic#33722) [CCR] Move ccr tests in core module back to ccr module (elastic#33711) HLRC: ML PUT Calendar (elastic#33362) [Tests] Fix randomization in StringTermsIT (elastic#33678) Pin TLS1.2 in SSLConfigurationReloaderTests
For #29827