[8.19] DocValuesConsumerUtil tweak #132901
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Be more strict about not finding a metadata entry based on field info number. If this were to happen, then this can cause issues in doc value consumer later. An example of such a failure is what is fixed via elastic#132597, here with shrinking the local segment and merged field numbers were not aligned causing serious merge errors in the tsdb doc value consumer. Currently such an issue shouldn't occur anymore.
martijnvg
added
backport
auto-merge-without-approval
martijnvg
changed the title
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Backporting #132586 to 8.19 branch.
Be more strict about not finding a metadata entry based on field info number. If this were to happen, then this can cause issues in doc value consumer later. An example of such a failure is what is fixed via #132597, here with shrinking the local segment and merged field numbers were not aligned causing serious merge errors in the tsdb doc value consumer. Currently such an issue shouldn't occur anymore.