Skip to content

Conversation

@mark-vieira
Copy link
Contributor

The libs projects where renamed in #115720 so we have to tweak some config in our IDE setup.

@mark-vieira mark-vieira added >non-issue :Delivery/Build Build or test infrastructure labels Oct 30, 2024
@mark-vieira mark-vieira requested a review from a team as a code owner October 30, 2024 14:33
@elasticsearchmachine elasticsearchmachine added v9.0.0 Team:Delivery Meta label for Delivery team labels Oct 30, 2024
@elasticsearchmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-delivery (Team:Delivery)

Copy link
Member

@rjernst rjernst left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

doLast {
['main', 'test'].each { sourceSet ->
modifyXml(".idea/modules/libs/native/elasticsearch.libs.elasticsearch-native.${sourceSet}.iml") { xml ->
modifyXml(".idea/modules/libs/native/elasticsearch.libs.${project.project(':libs:native').name}.${sourceSet}.iml") { xml ->
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can't we just hard code the project name here instead of referencing another projects project instance?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, the the point here is so that if that project name changes, this will explicitly fail. A missing file is leniently ignored.

@mark-vieira mark-vieira enabled auto-merge (squash) October 30, 2024 15:20
@mark-vieira mark-vieira merged commit 30079d1 into elastic:main Oct 30, 2024
17 checks passed
jfreden pushed a commit to jfreden/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request Nov 4, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

:Delivery/Build Build or test infrastructure >non-issue Team:Delivery Meta label for Delivery team v9.0.0

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants