[CI] CloseWhileRelocatingShardsIT.testCloseWhileRelocatingShards

[alpar-t]

Example build failure

https://elasticsearch-ci.elastic.co/job/elastic+elasticsearch+master+intake/1156/console

Reproduction line

does reproduce locally

./gradlew :server:integTest \
  -Dtests.seed=ECD17CF0692217A \
  -Dtests.class=org.elasticsearch.indices.state.CloseWhileRelocatingShardsIT \
  -Dtests.method="testCloseWhileRelocatingShards" \
  -Dtests.security.manager=true \
  -Dtests.locale=en-US \
  -Dtests.timezone=Asia/Famagusta \
  -Dcompiler.java=11 \
  -Druntime.java=8

Example relevant log:

19:48:36    > Throwable #1: java.lang.AssertionError: Consider that the test failed if no indices were successfully closed
19:48:36    > Expected: a value greater than <0>
19:48:36    >      but: <0> was equal to <0>
19:48:36    > 	at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([ECD17CF0692217A:2146095A290C77C0]:0)
19:48:36    > 	at org.hamcrest.MatcherAssert.assertThat(MatcherAssert.java:20)
19:48:36    > 	at org.elasticsearch.indices.state.CloseWhileRelocatingShardsIT.testCloseWhileRelocatingShards(CloseWhileRelocatingShardsIT.java:185)
19:48:36    > 	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)

Frequency

first of it's kind, "lucky" seed.

[elasticmachine]

Pinging @elastic/es-distributed

[alpar-t]

/cc @tlrx

[ywelsch]

I've looked into this one and whether it could be caused by timeouts which we've been more frequently seeing on CI these days. That's not the case here, and rather looks to be an actual bug. Can you have a look @tlrx?

[Tim-Brooks]

Some more failures:

https://elasticsearch-ci.elastic.co/job/elastic+elasticsearch+master+multijob-unix-compatibility/os=sles/173/console

https://elasticsearch-ci.elastic.co/job/elastic+elasticsearch+master+multijob-unix-compatibility/os=centos/173/console

[alpar-t]

Another one on intake: https://elasticsearch-ci.elastic.co/job/elastic+elasticsearch+master+intake/1200/console

Muted test in 82ca2d6

[tlrx]

@atorok Thanks for the mute. I opened #37348 to fix the test.