Skip to content

Conversation

@codebrain
Copy link
Contributor

@Mpdreamz Mpdreamz mentioned this pull request Dec 10, 2019
24 tasks
Copy link
Contributor

@russcam russcam left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've left a comment about the type names

}

///<summary>Request options for ExecuteRetention <para>https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/current/slm-api-execute-retention.html</para></summary>
public class ExecuteRetentionRequestParameters : RequestParameters<ExecuteRetentionRequestParameters>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should the type name(s) be ExecuteSnapshotLifecycleRetention* ? The shortened method names are fine, because they reflect what is in the spec and are namespaced on SnapshotLifecycleManagement, but with the types, these live in the root Nest namespace, which feels like we ought to be more explicit to avoid naming collisions now and in future.

@codebrain codebrain merged commit 4dc5666 into 7.x Dec 13, 2019
codebrain added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 13, 2019
@codebrain codebrain deleted the feature/7.5/slm-execute-retention branch December 13, 2019 08:17
@codebrain
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ported to master

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants