Skip to content

Conversation

@Ivanidzo4ka
Copy link
Contributor

Should fix #2828

@TomFinley TomFinley changed the title Scurbbing schema related transforms Scrubbing schema related transforms Mar 5, 2019
public bool KeepHidden { get; }
public bool IgnoreMissing { get; }
internal bool KeepHidden { get; }
internal bool IgnoreMissing { get; }
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we really need to hide them? They are some direct states of public options.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe it just me been paranoid and I want to hide everything I can.
On other hand we need to provide this information for each transformer, like term dictionary or list of columns we been concatenating for concat, and we don't have conclusion how to do it yet.

Copy link
Member

@wschin wschin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 5, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #2863 into master will increase coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2863      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   71.69%   71.69%   +<.01%     
==========================================
  Files         809      809              
  Lines      142444   142444              
  Branches    16109    16109              
==========================================
+ Hits       102126   102130       +4     
+ Misses      35891    35889       -2     
+ Partials     4427     4425       -2
Flag Coverage Δ
#Debug 71.69% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
#production 67.92% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
#test 85.89% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
....Data/Transforms/ColumnConcatenatingTransformer.cs 85.12% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
...ML.Data/Transforms/ColumnConcatenatingEstimator.cs 80.3% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
...rc/Microsoft.ML.Data/Transforms/ColumnSelecting.cs 97.32% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
src/Microsoft.ML.Data/Transforms/ColumnCopying.cs 85.43% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
.../Microsoft.ML.Data/Transforms/ExtensionsCatalog.cs 100% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
...ML.Transforms/Text/StopWordsRemovingTransformer.cs 85.69% <0%> (+0.16%) ⬆️
src/Microsoft.ML.Maml/MAML.cs 26.21% <0%> (+1.45%) ⬆️

Copy link
Contributor

@artidoro artidoro left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:shipit:

@Ivanidzo4ka Ivanidzo4ka merged commit 6f4e055 into dotnet:master Mar 6, 2019
@ghost ghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 23, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Scrubbing schema related transformers

3 participants