Skip to content

Conversation

@Smaug123
Copy link
Contributor

This is boilerplate around fsharp/fslang-suggestions#696 .

The actual implementation is #13298, but that has rotted several times. I'd like to get this boilerplate out of the way so that it stops rotting.

@Smaug123 Smaug123 requested a review from a team as a code owner January 22, 2023 13:56
@Smaug123
Copy link
Contributor Author

Now "A type has been implicitly inferred as obj, which may be unintended" plus the "consider disabling".

@Smaug123
Copy link
Contributor Author

I would like to get this in at some point in the near future, because this is the part of the change that rots the fastest.

@psfinaki
Copy link
Contributor

I am fine with the wording now. @dotnet/fsharp-team-msft ping

Copy link
Contributor

@abelbraaksma abelbraaksma left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Small nitpick, see below (I didn't repeat the comment for all translation files, these are generated automatically anyway). Otherwise good.

Copy link
Contributor

@abelbraaksma abelbraaksma left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looking good! I think this can be merged @vzarytovskii, @dsyme, @KevinRansom

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

Archived in project

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants