Skip to content

Conversation

@dsyme
Copy link
Contributor

@dsyme dsyme commented Oct 18, 2021

Replaces #10896

@dsyme dsyme force-pushed the feature/erased-unions branch from bbe7982 to 367ae5d Compare May 7, 2022 12:44
@dsyme dsyme force-pushed the feature/erased-unions branch 2 times, most recently from f8d0ac2 to 0d9388f Compare May 18, 2022 23:00
@vzarytovskii vzarytovskii marked this pull request as draft September 6, 2022 17:30
@RikkiGibson
Copy link
Member

I see that this has status "Not Planned" in the "F# Compiler and Tooling" project. Is that accurate? I was wondering if that was due to time constraints, or due to problems/complications discovered during implementation, or for another reason?

@vzarytovskii
Copy link
Member

vzarytovskii commented Mar 9, 2023

I see that this has status "Not Planned" in the "F# Compiler and Tooling" project. Is that accurate? I was wondering if that was due to time constraints, or due to problems/complications discovered during implementation, or for another reason?

That was a part of an automation, which puts everything as not planned :) we still would like to do it, but we mostly were/are waiting on C#'s implementation(s), so we may make interop/codegen compatible.

@lucasteles
Copy link

we mostly were/are waiting on C#'s implementation(s),

Is you talking abou C# DU implementation?

@vzarytovskii
Copy link
Member

we mostly were/are waiting on C#'s implementation(s),

Is you talking abou C# DU implementation?

Yes

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: New

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants