RawFSharpAssemblyDataBackedByLanguageService produces large amount of data both in Gen1 and LOH causing UI delays in VS

[davkean]

Trace: https://developercommunity.visualstudio.com/content/problem/245320/coloring-typing-tooltips-and-intellisense-slow-in.html
Trace: https://developercommunity.visualstudio.com/content/problem/245786/slow-f-editing-experience-up-to-a-minute-until-typ.html

Gen	Count	MaxPause	MaxPeak MB	Max AllocMB/sec	TotalPause	TotalAlloc MB	Alloc MB/MSec GC	Survived MB/MSec GC	MeanPause	Induced
ALL	1844	123.2	686.4	3,358.514	17,263.7	11,083.7	0.6	0.475	9.4	0
0	336	20.4	680.4	3,358.514	1,509.5	2,459.5	0.1	1.033	4.5	0
1	1501	33.4	686.4	1,110.648	15,009.3	8,597.9	1.4	0.227	10.0	0
2	7	123.2	686.4	50.786	744.9	26.2	0.1	313.871	106.4	0

This class is producing huge amounts 4 GB of data in the above trace:

450 MB of this ends up on the large object heap:

[davkean]

Note, https://developercommunity.visualstudio.com/content/problem/245786/slow-f-editing-experience-up-to-a-minute-until-typ.html also hits this.

[TIHan]

Driver.EncodeInterfaceData seems to be the culprit of this.

[cartermp]

Oh holy schmackos:

https://github.com/Microsoft/visualfsharp/blob/66b20f9d79933c5f284a66d09069fa91d976e6b9/src/fsharp/TastPickle.fs#L746-L805

This ends up allocating a 100KB array in memory twice:

https://github.com/Microsoft/visualfsharp/blob/fead0aac540485683f694524eadad79983ec28d9/src/absil/bytes.fs#L65-L67

[davkean]

Yeah that would do it.

[cartermp]

Related, from that same trace:

ByteBuffer.Ensure also allocates lots of data into the LOH:

https://github.com/Microsoft/visualfsharp/blob/9b55eccd1bc83ed123c5ae08c577be5646861830/src/absil/bytes.fs#L69-L74

[TIHan]

After digging into this for a day and half, this is a bit complicated to fix.

First, getting the ByteBuffer to be a chunked array isn't trivial because ilwrite.fs depends upon a byte []. We would have to make some interesting changes to ilwrite.fs to understand how to deal with chunked arrays rather than a single array. I think this is fine, but it would mean exposing ByteBuffer as a public type for ILResourceLocation. We would need to change what ILResourceLocation is. Currently it's a DU which I believe it should not be; should be a class.

Another approach would be to add a ChunkedByteBuffer and only use it for F# metadata. However, it still requires changes to ILResourceLocation and parts of ilwrite.fs for it to understand how to get the data.

Before we fix ByteBuffer and F# metadata writing, we should probably redesign ILResourceLocation and/or ILResource to be a better abstraction and get that functioning properly. After that, then we can come back to handling F# metadata differently.

[dsyme]

In addition to looking at the shape/format of the allocated data, I think we need to dig into why RawFSharpAssemblyDataBackedByLanguageService is being created so often.

My intuition is that one memoized instance of this should be forced each time ParseAndCheckProjectImpl is run to completion, causing a GetCheckResultsAndImplementationsForProject, causing a IncrementalBuild.Eval on ``finalizedTypeCheckNode. This result should be saved into the partial build for the project (save` = `SavePartialBuild`) and should not be evaluated again unless something changes in the project.

Now ParseAndCheckProjectImpl is called by both the FCS entry point ParseAndCheckProject and the contents of transitive project references are required via IProjectReference.EvaluateRawContents. It is particularly important to discover if it is referenced projects that are being checked again (IProjectReference.EvaluateRawContents), or the current project (ParseAndCheckProject).

If it is rechecking the current project that is causing this then we actually don't need to create RawFSharpAssemblyDataBackedByLanguageService for this case. We could add an extra node to the incremental build graph to ensure this is only created for transitive references.

If it is rechecking referenced projects then something is fishy. I feel it's likely that something is going wrong with memoizing these results in the incremental build graph: I suspect something is forcing referenced projects to be checked over and over again. Perhaps we have even fixed a bug in that area?

I think the right approach is to get Trace logging which prints out the causal trace for the RawFSharpAssemblyDataBackedByLanguageService creation each time it is created. The best causal trace printing we have is via the userOpName which we pass around. Passing this down to RawFSharpAssemblyDataBackedByLanguageService and emitting a Trace.WriteLine call may just do the trick to get a trace that tells us why re-evaluations are happening.

[davkean]

If you just need a stack, PerfView can do that for you. I'm of the same feeling, as I called out in #5938 it feels like we're doing a bunch of work over and over again and missing the cache.

[TIHan]

If it is rechecking the current project that is causing this then we actually don't need to create RawFSharpAssemblyDataBackedByLanguageService for this case. We could add an extra node to the incremental build graph to ensure this is only created for transitive references.

I assumed this was already happening, but we should get a trace to see.

[cartermp]

We should have the trace to see if that's the case