Skip to content

Conversation

@janniclas
Copy link
Contributor

actually sending user token to validate the different access levels to the instance registry. Before all valid requests to our scala play server were forwarded as admin requests

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Mar 28, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #141 into develop will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 0%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##           develop   #141   +/-   ##
======================================
  Coverage        0%     0%           
======================================
  Files           13     13           
  Lines           16     16           
  Branches         2      1    -1     
======================================
  Misses          16     16
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
app/authorization/AuthAction.scala 0% <0%> (ø) ⬆️
app/controllers/InstanceRegistryController.scala 0% <0%> (ø) ⬆️
app/authorization/AuthProvider.scala 0% <0%> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 3b90bc1...dfc8530. Read the comment docs.

@janniclas janniclas merged commit aedecd9 into develop Mar 29, 2019
@ghost ghost removed the review label Mar 29, 2019
@janniclas janniclas deleted the hotfix/userAccessLevelFix branch March 29, 2019 13:51
@janniclas janniclas mentioned this pull request Mar 30, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants