[analyzer] Implement constructor tearoffs support in the analyzer

[eernstg]

This issue tracks support of the constructor tearoffs feature. See the enclosing meta-issue for details.

The implementation issues for this feature are needed in order to have a reference when approving test failures. Further information will be added here when the implementation work starts.

[eernstg]

Closing: This issue is a duplicate of #46020.

[eernstg]

@srawlins, FYI: This issue turns out to be a duplicate of #46020. I've closed this one and changed the link on the main tracking issue for this feature (#46228) such that we will only use #46020.