Skip to content

Conversation

javier-aliaga
Copy link
Contributor

@javier-aliaga javier-aliaga commented Jun 20, 2025

Description

Supports new task execution id

Issue reference

We strive to have all PR being opened based on an issue, where the problem or feature have been discussed prior to implementation.

Please reference the issue this PR will close: #[issue number]

Checklist

Please make sure you've completed the relevant tasks for this PR, out of the following list:

  • Code compiles correctly
  • Created/updated tests
  • Extended the documentation

@javier-aliaga javier-aliaga changed the title chore: New task execution task id test (#1352) chore: New task execution task id test Jun 20, 2025
@javier-aliaga javier-aliaga marked this pull request as ready for review June 20, 2025 10:49
@javier-aliaga javier-aliaga requested review from a team as code owners June 20, 2025 10:49
@artur-ciocanu
Copy link
Contributor

@javier-aliaga it seems that there might be some dependency on the Java Durable Task library, currently the build fails with compilation error because getTaskExecutionKey is missing from io.dapr.durabletask.TaskActivityContext

@javier-aliaga javier-aliaga marked this pull request as draft June 30, 2025 07:47
@javier-aliaga
Copy link
Contributor Author

@artur-ciocanu , I put it as draft until the changes are merged

@javier-aliaga javier-aliaga force-pushed the task-execution-id branch 10 times, most recently from 873f12a to ee89757 Compare July 21, 2025 11:02
@javier-aliaga javier-aliaga changed the title chore: New task execution task id test chore: New task execution task i Aug 8, 2025
@javier-aliaga javier-aliaga changed the title chore: New task execution task i chore: New task execution task id Aug 8, 2025
@javier-aliaga javier-aliaga force-pushed the task-execution-id branch 3 times, most recently from 354fe58 to 9b177cf Compare August 8, 2025 15:34
@javier-aliaga javier-aliaga marked this pull request as ready for review August 8, 2025 15:35
@javier-aliaga javier-aliaga force-pushed the task-execution-id branch 2 times, most recently from 030c564 to 6ec2405 Compare August 8, 2025 16:43
@cicoyle cicoyle added this to the v1.16 milestone Aug 19, 2025
salaboy
salaboy previously approved these changes Aug 26, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

@salaboy salaboy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/LGTM

@javier-aliaga javier-aliaga changed the base branch from master to release-1.16 August 26, 2025 15:37
@javier-aliaga javier-aliaga dismissed salaboy’s stale review August 26, 2025 15:37

The base branch was changed.

@javier-aliaga javier-aliaga changed the base branch from release-1.16 to master August 26, 2025 15:44
@javier-aliaga javier-aliaga force-pushed the task-execution-id branch 3 times, most recently from 5fd703b to 291841a Compare August 26, 2025 15:52
@javier-aliaga javier-aliaga force-pushed the task-execution-id branch 5 times, most recently from 6bba1d6 to 45b8db8 Compare August 27, 2025 10:46
salaboy
salaboy previously approved these changes Aug 27, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

@salaboy salaboy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/LGTM

@javier-aliaga javier-aliaga force-pushed the task-execution-id branch 3 times, most recently from 1fd7b23 to dbbce8e Compare August 27, 2025 14:01
* chore: New task execution task id test

test how taskExecutionTaskId can be used for idempotency

Signed-off-by: Javier Aliaga <[email protected]>

* chore: Clean up not used files

Signed-off-by: Javier Aliaga <[email protected]>

* docs: Task execution keys

Signed-off-by: Javier Aliaga <[email protected]>

* test: Modify unit tests

Signed-off-by: Javier Aliaga <[email protected]>

* Remove new lines

Signed-off-by: artur-ciocanu <[email protected]>

---------

Signed-off-by: Javier Aliaga <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: artur-ciocanu <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Cassie Coyle <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: artur-ciocanu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Javier Aliaga <[email protected]>
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 27, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 78.75%. Comparing base (d759c53) to head (f127c03).
⚠️ Report is 204 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #1430      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     76.91%   78.75%   +1.84%     
- Complexity     1592     1924     +332     
============================================
  Files           145      237      +92     
  Lines          4843     5932    +1089     
  Branches        562      610      +48     
============================================
+ Hits           3725     4672     +947     
- Misses          821      938     +117     
- Partials        297      322      +25     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants