blk-cgroup: fix possible deadlock while configuring policy

[ Upstream commit 5d726c4 ]

Following deadlock can be triggered easily by lockdep:

WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.17.0-rc3-00124-ga12c2658ced0 #1665 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
check/1334 is trying to acquire lock:
ff1100011d9d0678 (&q->sysfs_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: blk_unregister_queue+0x53/0x180

but task is already holding lock:
ff1100011d9d00e0 (&q->q_usage_counter(queue)#3){++++}-{0:0}, at: del_gendisk+0xba/0x110

which lock already depends on the new lock.

the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #2 (&q->q_usage_counter(queue)#3){++++}-{0:0}:
       blk_queue_enter+0x40b/0x470
       blkg_conf_prep+0x7b/0x3c0
       tg_set_limit+0x10a/0x3e0
       cgroup_file_write+0xc6/0x420
       kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x189/0x280
       vfs_write+0x256/0x490
       ksys_write+0x83/0x190
       __x64_sys_write+0x21/0x30
       x64_sys_call+0x4608/0x4630
       do_syscall_64+0xdb/0x6b0
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

-> #1 (&q->rq_qos_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}:
       __mutex_lock+0xd8/0xf50
       mutex_lock_nested+0x2b/0x40
       wbt_init+0x17e/0x280
       wbt_enable_default+0xe9/0x140
       blk_register_queue+0x1da/0x2e0
       __add_disk+0x38c/0x5d0
       add_disk_fwnode+0x89/0x250
       device_add_disk+0x18/0x30
       virtblk_probe+0x13a3/0x1800
       virtio_dev_probe+0x389/0x610
       really_probe+0x136/0x620
       __driver_probe_device+0xb3/0x230
       driver_probe_device+0x2f/0xe0
       __driver_attach+0x158/0x250
       bus_for_each_dev+0xa9/0x130
       driver_attach+0x26/0x40
       bus_add_driver+0x178/0x3d0
       driver_register+0x7d/0x1c0
       __register_virtio_driver+0x2c/0x60
       virtio_blk_init+0x6f/0xe0
       do_one_initcall+0x94/0x540
       kernel_init_freeable+0x56a/0x7b0
       kernel_init+0x2b/0x270
       ret_from_fork+0x268/0x4c0
       ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30

-> #0 (&q->sysfs_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}:
       __lock_acquire+0x1835/0x2940
       lock_acquire+0xf9/0x450
       __mutex_lock+0xd8/0xf50
       mutex_lock_nested+0x2b/0x40
       blk_unregister_queue+0x53/0x180
       __del_gendisk+0x226/0x690
       del_gendisk+0xba/0x110
       sd_remove+0x49/0xb0 [sd_mod]
       device_remove+0x87/0xb0
       device_release_driver_internal+0x11e/0x230
       device_release_driver+0x1a/0x30
       bus_remove_device+0x14d/0x220
       device_del+0x1e1/0x5a0
       __scsi_remove_device+0x1ff/0x2f0
       scsi_remove_device+0x37/0x60
       sdev_store_delete+0x77/0x100
       dev_attr_store+0x1f/0x40
       sysfs_kf_write+0x65/0x90
       kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x189/0x280
       vfs_write+0x256/0x490
       ksys_write+0x83/0x190
       __x64_sys_write+0x21/0x30
       x64_sys_call+0x4608/0x4630
       do_syscall_64+0xdb/0x6b0
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

other info that might help us debug this:

Chain exists of:
  &q->sysfs_lock --> &q->rq_qos_mutex --> &q->q_usage_counter(queue)#3

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(&q->q_usage_counter(queue)#3);
                               lock(&q->rq_qos_mutex);
                               lock(&q->q_usage_counter(queue)#3);
  lock(&q->sysfs_lock);

Root cause is that queue_usage_counter is grabbed with rq_qos_mutex
held in blkg_conf_prep(), while queue should be freezed before
rq_qos_mutex from other context.

The blk_queue_enter() from blkg_conf_prep() is used to protect against
policy deactivation, which is already protected with blkcg_mutex, hence
convert blk_queue_enter() to blkcg_mutex to fix this problem. Meanwhile,
consider that blkcg_mutex is held after queue is freezed from policy
deactivation, also convert blkg_alloc() to use GFP_NOIO.

Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

Author: YuKuai-huawei

block/blk-cgroup.c

@@ -847,14 +847,8 @@ int blkg_conf_prep(struct blkcg *blkcg, const struct blkcg_policy *pol,
 	disk = ctx->bdev->bd_disk;
 	q = disk->queue;
 
-	/*
-	 * blkcg_deactivate_policy() requires queue to be frozen, we can grab
-	 * q_usage_counter to prevent concurrent with blkcg_deactivate_policy().
-	 */
-	ret = blk_queue_enter(q, 0);
-	if (ret)
-		goto fail;
-
+	/* Prevent concurrent with blkcg_deactivate_policy() */
+	mutex_lock(&q->blkcg_mutex);
 	spin_lock_irq(&q->queue_lock);
 
 	if (!blkcg_policy_enabled(q, pol)) {
@@ -884,16 +878,16 @@ int blkg_conf_prep(struct blkcg *blkcg, const struct blkcg_policy *pol,
 		/* Drop locks to do new blkg allocation with GFP_KERNEL. */
 		spin_unlock_irq(&q->queue_lock);
 
-		new_blkg = blkg_alloc(pos, disk, GFP_KERNEL);
+		new_blkg = blkg_alloc(pos, disk, GFP_NOIO);
 		if (unlikely(!new_blkg)) {
 			ret = -ENOMEM;
-			goto fail_exit_queue;
+			goto fail_exit;
 		}
 
 		if (radix_tree_preload(GFP_KERNEL)) {
 			blkg_free(new_blkg);
 			ret = -ENOMEM;
-			goto fail_exit_queue;
+			goto fail_exit;
 		}
 
 		spin_lock_irq(&q->queue_lock);
@@ -921,17 +915,16 @@ int blkg_conf_prep(struct blkcg *blkcg, const struct blkcg_policy *pol,
 			goto success;
 	}
 success:
-	blk_queue_exit(q);
+	mutex_unlock(&q->blkcg_mutex);
 	ctx->blkg = blkg;
 	return 0;
 
 fail_preloaded:
 	radix_tree_preload_end();
 fail_unlock:
 	spin_unlock_irq(&q->queue_lock);
-fail_exit_queue:
-	blk_queue_exit(q);
-fail:
+fail_exit:
+	mutex_unlock(&q->blkcg_mutex);
 	/*
 	 * If queue was bypassing, we should retry.  Do so after a
 	 * short msleep().  It isn't strictly necessary but queue