P1854 Conversion to literal encoding should not lead to loss of meaning

[wg21bot]

P1854R0 Conversion to execution encoding should not lead to loss of meaning (Corentin Jabot)

[jfbastien]

SG16 first.

[tahonermann]

SG16 reviewed P1854R0 in Belfast and decided to introduce a dependency on P1885. Marking as needing revision.

SG16 minutes are available at the following locations. Polls on this paper are recorded with the polls taken on P1855R0.

• http://wiki.edg.com/bin/view/Wg21belfast/SG16P1854R0
• http://wiki.edg.com/bin/view/Wg21belfast/SG16P1885R0

[tahonermann]

Closing; per the author, this paper has been superseded by P2178.

[wg21bot]

P1854R1 Conversion to literal encoding should not lead to loss of meaning (Corentin Jabot)