consider renaming [*.erasure] to [*.erase]

[zygoloid]

We'd need to move [string.erase] out of the way first.

However, reserving [containername.erase] for a member named erase, and using a different name for the non-member form, seems preferable. Maybe [*.erase.nonmem] for the new ones?

[jensmaurer]

[*.erase.nonmem] seems a bit long...

[jensmaurer]

Editorial meeting:

• [string.erase] stays as-is.
• Going for [*.string.nonmem] is worse than [*.erasure].
• Net result: Do nothing.