[expr.new] p18 Weird index entries for initialization in new-expression

[jwakely]

Most of these index entries aren't mentioned in the text and don't seem related to it at all:

\pnum
\indextext{\idxcode{new}!array of class objects and}%
\indextext{\idxcode{new}!initialization and}%
\indextext{\idxcode{new}!constructor and}%
\indextext{\idxcode{new}!default constructor and}%
\indextext{default constructor|see{constructor, default}}%
\indextext{trivial type}%
\indextext{trivial class type}%
A \grammarterm{new-expression} that creates an object of type \tcode{T}
initializes that object as follows:

\begin{itemize}
\item If the \grammarterm{new-initializer} is omitted, the object is
default-initialized\iref{dcl.init}. \begin{note} If no initialization
is performed, the object has an indeterminate value. \end{note}

\item Otherwise, the \grammarterm{new-initializer} is interpreted according to
the initialization rules of~\ref{dcl.init} for direct-initialization.
\end{itemize}

This paragraph isn't directly talking about arrays of class objects and new, nor constructors and new, nor default constructors and new but I can see the relevance. However it's not talking about default constructors outside of the context of a new-expression, nor trivial types nor trivial class types. The last three index entries seem completely out of place.