[basic.scope.class] CWG 2331: is redundant

[tkoeppe]

The first four paragraphs of [basic.scope.class] (3.3.7) are somewhat reduntant. As @zygoloid noted:

• The normative paragraphs are 4 and 2.
• Paragraph 1 is subsumed by p4.
• Paragraph 3 follows from existing rules for name hiding.

We felt that this was too much to reword editorially though and would like CWG guidance. We could produce a pull request and let CWG decide whether the change is editorial, and if not the proposed wording could be moved into a Core issue.

[jensmaurer]

Did someone e-mail Mike Miller already?

[tkoeppe]

@jensmaurer: Not yet. Could you perhaps? Will you be in the upcoming teleconference?

[jensmaurer]

Sent e-mail to Mike Miller.

Yes, I will join the teleconference next Monday.

[jensmaurer]

see CWG 2331

[zygoloid]

Closing now we are tracking this as a core issue.