Upgrade build-image from Debian stretch to buster #3323
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
pstibrany
approved these changes
Oct 12, 2020
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I assume this build image fixes old Git version problem .There is a mention in .github/README.md about this that should be updated.
Signed-off-by: Marco Pracucci <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Marco Pracucci <[email protected]>
pracucci
force-pushed
the
upgrade-build-image-debian
branch
from
d94de23 to
9dbc6ae
Compare
Signed-off-by: Marco Pracucci <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What this PR does:
The PR #3302 made me realise the
build-imageis built on top of an old version of Debian. In this PR I'm attempting to upgrade to Debian buster.Protobuf compiled sources have changed because
libprotobuf-dev(installed via apt-get) upgraded from 3.0.0 to 3.6.1. To my understanding, this shouldn't be an issue for us.I manually tested building the website and it looks good.
/cc @AzfaarQureshi
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
N/A
Checklist
CHANGELOG.mdupdated - the order of entries should be[CHANGE],[FEATURE],[ENHANCEMENT],[BUGFIX]