Skip to content

Conversation

sunil-lakshman
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@sunil-lakshman sunil-lakshman marked this pull request as ready for review March 25, 2025 07:46
@sunil-lakshman sunil-lakshman requested a review from a team as a code owner March 25, 2025 07:46
cs-raj
cs-raj previously approved these changes Mar 25, 2025
@sunil-lakshman sunil-lakshman dismissed cs-raj’s stale review March 25, 2025 07:50

The merge-base changed after approval.

nadeem-cs
nadeem-cs previously approved these changes Mar 25, 2025
@sunil-lakshman sunil-lakshman dismissed nadeem-cs’s stale review March 25, 2025 07:56

The merge-base changed after approval.

nadeem-cs
nadeem-cs previously approved these changes Mar 25, 2025
@sunil-lakshman sunil-lakshman dismissed nadeem-cs’s stale review March 25, 2025 08:30

The merge-base changed after approval.

@nadeem-cs
Copy link
Contributor

@sunil-lakshman The approvals are getting dismissed everytime. Can you close this PR and create a new PR for these same changes?

harshithad0703
harshithad0703 previously approved these changes Mar 26, 2025
@sunil-lakshman sunil-lakshman dismissed harshithad0703’s stale review March 26, 2025 06:18

The merge-base changed after approval.

harshithad0703
harshithad0703 previously approved these changes Mar 26, 2025
@sunil-lakshman sunil-lakshman dismissed harshithad0703’s stale review March 26, 2025 06:23

The merge-base changed after approval.

reeshika-h
reeshika-h previously approved these changes Mar 26, 2025
@sunil-lakshman sunil-lakshman dismissed reeshika-h’s stale review March 26, 2025 06:29

The merge-base changed after approval.

@sunil-lakshman sunil-lakshman merged commit 2a877cd into development Mar 26, 2025
14 checks passed
@sunil-lakshman sunil-lakshman deleted the fix/1694-global-fields branch March 26, 2025 07:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants