Skip to content

Conversation

@lsm5
Copy link
Member

@lsm5 lsm5 commented Nov 17, 2025

Checklist

Ensure you have completed the following checklist for your pull request to be reviewed:

  • Certify you wrote the patch or otherwise have the right to pass it on as an open-source patch by signing all
    commits. (git commit -s). (If needed, use git commit -s --amend). The author email must match
    the sign-off email address. See CONTRIBUTING.md
    for more information.
  • Referenced issues using Fixes: #00000 in commit message (if applicable)
  • Tests have been added/updated (or no tests are needed)
  • Documentation has been updated (or no documentation changes are needed)
  • All commits pass make validatepr (format/lint checks)
  • Release note entered in the section below (or None if no user-facing changes)

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

None

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added release-note-none do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. labels Nov 17, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 17, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: lsm5

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Nov 17, 2025
@lsm5
Copy link
Member Author

lsm5 commented Nov 17, 2025

Depends on containers/container-libs#464

@lsm5 lsm5 added the No New Tests Allow PR to proceed without adding regression tests label Nov 17, 2025
@lsm5 lsm5 force-pushed the cgv1-removal-vendor branch from 64c886a to 2b337bb Compare November 21, 2025 15:50
@github-actions github-actions bot added the kind/api-change Change to remote API; merits scrutiny label Nov 21, 2025
@lsm5 lsm5 changed the title Remove AddPid and simplify cgroups.AvailableControllers CGgroups v1 cleanup: Round 2 w/ container-libs vendoring Nov 21, 2025
@lsm5
Copy link
Member Author

lsm5 commented Nov 21, 2025

machine-linux podman fedora-42-aarch64 rootless host failing with Failed to start: FAILED_PRECONDITION: Insufficient capacity. (Service: Ec2, Status Code: 500, Request ID: 816dcd07-0785-4d68-a143-ddf5eea0d459) (SDK Attempt Count: 4) . Does that usually occur?

_, err := cgroups.New(cgroupPath, &cgroupResources)
if err != nil {
logrus.StandardLogger().Logf(logLevel, "Failed to add conmon to cgroupfs sandbox cgroup: %v", err)
} else if err := control.AddPid(cmd.Process.Pid); err != nil {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is removing this correct? (I have no idea.)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. kind/api-change Change to remote API; merits scrutiny No New Tests Allow PR to proceed without adding regression tests release-note-none

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants