Add section about exclusive params with expressions, and emphasize command output lines

[kinow]

Closes #162

Emphasizes command output lines of interest for users reading the text.

Renames “Advanced Inputs” to “Inclusive and Exclusive Inputs”. I thought it made sense as that section is specifically about these two variations of arguments. I realized a better name could be useful after reading the TODO notes, where we have future content for this section that could be considered advanced too, but I think it would be best to use separate sections. What others think?

Adds a new section below the “Inclusive and Exclusive Inputs”, called ”Exclusive Input Parameters with Expressions”, using an example similar to what is described in #162.

[kinow]

The first commit updates the existing docs to emphasize the lines of interest in the command output. See the before and after below:

1/

2/

3/

I did that because I didn't see the warning in the second code block, where the important part is “record-job2.yml:6:3: Warning: invalid field itemD, expected one of: 'itemC'”.

[kinow]

Suggestion to rename the Advanced Inputs section to Include and Exclusive Inputs

Rationale: In the future we might add new sub-sections to the Inputs section. Some could be considered Advanced Inputs too?

[kinow]

Added new section about exclusive params with expressions, preview available here: https://common-workflow-languageuser-guide--247.org.readthedocs.build/en/247/topics/inputs.html#exclusive-input-parameters-with-expressions

[mr-c]

In general, I quite like this; thanks!