⚡️ Speed up function _freq_to_period by 86%
#485
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
📄 86% (0.86x) speedup for
_freq_to_periodings_quant/timeseries/technicals.py⏱️ Runtime :
16.7 milliseconds→9.01 milliseconds(best of38runs)📝 Explanation and details
Optimizations made:
freq(for enums, this is faster than always calling.valueor using string comparison).asfreq_valto avoid repeated logic in the business day case.Note: Assumes
Frequencyis either an enum/type or string-like - this mirrors the type handling from the original implementation, and optimizations for comparison assume thatvalueor direct string are used depending onFrequencyimplementation.✅ Correctness verification report:
🌀 Generated Regression Tests and Runtime
To edit these changes
git checkout codeflash/optimize-_freq_to_period-mhb6elb7and push.