⚡️ Speed up function fixing_table_handler by 9%
          #478
        
          
      
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
  Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
  You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
  Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
  This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
  Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
  Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
  Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
  
    
  
    
📄 9% (0.09x) speedup for
fixing_table_handlerings_quant/risk/result_handlers.py⏱️ Runtime :
3.95 milliseconds→3.64 milliseconds(best of434runs)📝 Explanation and details
The optimized code achieves an 8% speedup through two key optimizations:
1. List Comprehensions Replace Explicit Loop:
The original code used a
forloop with.append()calls to build thedatesandvalueslists. The optimized version replaces this with list comprehensions, which are implemented in C and avoid Python function call overhead for each iteration.2. Function Reference Caching:
The optimization extracts
dt.date.fromisoformatinto a local variablefromisoformatbefore the list comprehension. This eliminates repeated attribute lookups (dt.date.fromisoformat) on every iteration, reducing overhead from Python's attribute resolution mechanism.Performance Analysis:
The line profiler shows the optimization is most effective for larger datasets. While small test cases (single rows) show minimal improvement, the large-scale test cases demonstrate 11-16% speedups (e.g., 1000 rows: 387μs → 336μs). This pattern makes sense because:
The optimization is particularly beneficial for batch processing scenarios with many fixing table rows, which appears to be the primary use case based on the test coverage.
✅ Correctness verification report:
🌀 Generated Regression Tests and Runtime
To edit these changes
git checkout codeflash/optimize-fixing_table_handler-mhb364mland push.