Skip to content

Conversation

@aseembits93
Copy link
Contributor

@aseembits93 aseembits93 commented May 13, 2025

PR Type

Enhancement, Tests


Description

  • Support range object comparisons.

  • Add tests for range comparisons.


Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Enhancement
comparator.py
Add range support in comparator                                                   

codeflash/verification/comparator.py

  • Added range to simple types tuple
  • Now compares range using ==
  • +1/-0     
    Tests
    test_comparator.py
    Add tests for range comparisons                                                   

    tests/test_comparator.py

  • Added tests comparing equal range objects
  • Assert inequality for different ranges
  • +6/-0     

    Need help?
  • Type /help how to ... in the comments thread for any questions about PR-Agent usage.
  • Check out the documentation for more information.
  • @github-actions
    Copy link

    PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

    Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 2 🔵🔵⚪⚪⚪
    🧪 PR contains tests
    🔒 No security concerns identified
    ⚡ Recommended focus areas for review

    Range edge cases

    The comparator now relies on direct equality of range objects but certain ranges can be equal by sequence even with different parameters (e.g., empty ranges or ranges with different steps but same elements). Consider handling or documenting these edge cases.

    range
    Limited test coverage

    Tests cover basic equal and non-equal ranges but do not exercise scenarios like empty ranges, negative steps, or non-unit steps. Add tests for these cases to ensure the comparator behaves as expected.

    a = range(1,10)
    b = range(1,10)
    c = range(1,20)
    assert comparator(a, b)
    assert not comparator(a, c)

    @github-actions
    Copy link

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    No code suggestions found for the PR.

    @aseembits93 aseembits93 enabled auto-merge May 13, 2025 22:30
    @aseembits93 aseembits93 disabled auto-merge May 13, 2025 22:56
    @KRRT7
    Copy link
    Contributor

    KRRT7 commented May 13, 2025

    @aseembits93 I think the PR reviewer is right, we should exercise scenarios like empty ranges, negative steps, or non-unit steps.

    KRRT7
    KRRT7 previously approved these changes May 13, 2025
    Copy link
    Contributor

    @zomglings zomglings left a comment

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    lgtm

    @aseembits93 aseembits93 enabled auto-merge May 13, 2025 23:27
    @aseembits93 aseembits93 merged commit 3f795db into main May 13, 2025
    15 checks passed
    @aseembits93 aseembits93 deleted the range-comparator branch May 13, 2025 23:27
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

    Projects

    None yet

    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    4 participants