Skip to content

Conversation

@misrasaurabh1
Copy link
Contributor

@misrasaurabh1 misrasaurabh1 commented Apr 30, 2025

PR Type

Bug fix, Enhancement


Description

  • Catch SQLite parse errors and warn

  • Ensure DB closes on parse failures

  • Add new plugins to Pytest blocklists

  • Tidy formatting in test runner


Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Error handling
parse_test_output.py
Safe SQLite test result parsing                                                   

codeflash/verification/parse_test_output.py

  • Initialized db variable before database operations
  • Added exception handling with warning on failure
  • Ensured database connection closes on errors
  • +6/-0     
    Configuration changes
    test_runner.py
    Update pytest plugin exclusion lists                                         

    codeflash/verification/test_runner.py

  • Expanded pytest plugin blocklists with new entries
  • Standardized LINE_PROFILE assignment formatting
  • Added whitespace cleanup around function definitions
  • +5/-4     

    Need help?
  • Type /help how to ... in the comments thread for any questions about PR-Agent usage.
  • Check out the documentation for more information.
  • @github-actions
    Copy link

    github-actions bot commented Apr 30, 2025

    PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

    (Review updated until commit a28c6cd)

    Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 2 🔵🔵⚪⚪⚪
    🧪 No relevant tests
    🔒 No security concerns identified
    ⚡ Recommended focus areas for review

    Unprotected Close

    Closing the database connection in the finally block without checking if db is initialized (or already closed) can raise an attribute error when db is None.

    db = None
    try:
        db = sqlite3.connect(sqlite_file_path)
        cur = db.cursor()
        data = cur.execute(
            "SELECT test_module_path, test_class_name, test_function_name, "
            "function_getting_tested, loop_index, iteration_id, runtime, return_value,verification_type FROM test_results"
        ).fetchall()
    except Exception as e:
        logger.warning(f"Failed to parse test results from {sqlite_file_path}. Exception: {e}")
        if db is not None:
            db.close()
        return test_results
    finally:
        db.close()
    Broad Exception Catch

    The code catches all Exception, which may hide specific SQLite parse errors; consider catching sqlite3.DatabaseError (or a more specific subclass) instead.

    except Exception as e:
        logger.warning(f"Failed to parse test results from {sqlite_file_path}. Exception: {e}")
        if db is not None:
            db.close()
        return test_results

    @github-actions
    Copy link

    github-actions bot commented Apr 30, 2025

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    Latest suggestions up to a28c6cd
    Explore these optional code suggestions:

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Impact
    Possible issue
    Fix variable name in subprocess call

    Replace the undefined test_files with the correct parameter test_paths to avoid a
    NameError when invoking the subprocess.

    codeflash/verification/test_runner.py [196]

    -pytest_cmd_list + pytest_args + blocklist_args + result_args + test_files
    +pytest_cmd_list + pytest_args + blocklist_args + result_args + test_paths
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9

    __

    Why: This change addresses the undefined test_files variable by using the correct test_paths parameter, preventing a NameError in the subprocess invocation.

    High
    Guard database closure

    Prevent a crash when db is None by only closing the connection if it was opened.
    This avoids calling close() on None.

    codeflash/verification/parse_test_output.py [123-124]

     finally:
    -    db.close()
    +    if db is not None:
    +        db.close()
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

    __

    Why: The suggestion correctly prevents calling db.close() on None, avoiding a potential crash when no database connection was opened.

    Medium

    Previous suggestions

    Suggestions up to commit 9d1b9ec
    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Impact
    General
    Merge shared blocklist plugins

    Consolidate the common plugins into a shared constant to reduce duplication and keep
    both blocklists in sync.

    codeflash/verification/test_runner.py [18-19]

    -BEHAVIORAL_BLOCKLISTED_PLUGINS = ["benchmark", "codspeed", "xdist", "sugar"]
    -BENCHMARKING_BLOCKLISTED_PLUGINS = ["codspeed", "cov", "benchmark", "profiling", "xdist", "sugar"]
    +COMMON_BLOCKLIST_PLUGINS = ["benchmark", "codspeed", "xdist", "sugar"]
    +BEHAVIORAL_BLOCKLISTED_PLUGINS = COMMON_BLOCKLIST_PLUGINS
    +BENCHMARKING_BLOCKLISTED_PLUGINS = COMMON_BLOCKLIST_PLUGINS + ["cov", "profiling"]
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6

    __

    Why: Consolidating common entries into COMMON_BLOCKLIST_PLUGINS improves maintainability and avoids duplication, though it only has a moderate impact on functionality.

    Low
    Deduplicate blocklist entries

    Ensure the blocklist does not contain duplicate entries by deduplicating the list at
    definition time. This avoids redundant plugin filters and makes maintenance easier.

    codeflash/verification/test_runner.py [18]

    -BEHAVIORAL_BLOCKLISTED_PLUGINS = ["benchmark", "codspeed", "xdist", "sugar"]
    +BEHAVIORAL_BLOCKLISTED_PLUGINS = list(dict.fromkeys(["benchmark", "codspeed", "xdist", "sugar"]))
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 3

    __

    Why: The suggestion deduplicates BEHAVIORAL_BLOCKLISTED_PLUGINS but the list already contains no duplicates, making the change unnecessary with low impact.

    Low

    @misrasaurabh1 misrasaurabh1 marked this pull request as ready for review May 9, 2025 22:34
    @misrasaurabh1 misrasaurabh1 requested a review from KRRT7 May 9, 2025 22:34
    @github-actions
    Copy link

    github-actions bot commented May 9, 2025

    Persistent review updated to latest commit a28c6cd

    @misrasaurabh1 misrasaurabh1 enabled auto-merge May 13, 2025 01:14
    @misrasaurabh1 misrasaurabh1 merged commit e274a06 into main May 13, 2025
    15 checks passed
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

    Projects

    None yet

    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    3 participants