-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Fix link pathing #257
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Fix link pathing #257
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
bc8ad40
Fix github edit link pathing
nlundquist 26e6b1e
Simplify helper call to sourceLink
nlundquist 92be2a6
Fix GitHub stars shield on 'API Docs' page
nlundquist 133262b
Check for required input in template & don't call docMapInfo.getCurre…
nlundquist File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would
{{#sourceLink(repoName)}}work outside the<li>to prevent the link from being rendered if we can’t get the link?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, I don't think it would. However I haven't been able to reproduce a situation where
sourceLinkfails to get a link.That would only occur if
docMapInfo.getCurrent().srcis undefined and I haven't seen that. Do you know if that's a likely situation?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I did a quick check on if
docMapInfo.getCurrent().src === undefinedoccurs. It does, but apparently only when rendering subsection headers, for example, "behaviors" under the can-connect. That "virtual parent page" doesn't have content so it's just an ordering in the side menu and doesn't render a page where this tag without a link would be visible.From what I can tell the removal of the
{{#with}}shouldn't have any side effects.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
FYI, those group pages do exist: https://canjs.com/doc/can-connect.behaviors.html
I’m not sure why the edit button doesn’t render now (I think
#withis always supposed to render), but it wouldn’t hurt to check if the changes in this PR affect that.Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For interests sake, is there any way to navigate to that page without knowing the URL? Should we add some content (an index of it's children?) to that page seeing as it exists?
For now I can change this back as removing the
#withnow causes the page to have an edit link.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There will be with search: #259
In that issue I debate that we should either not have those pages at all. If we keep them, then yeah, better content would be in order.