Update glossary.md #40
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you, @r03ert0! The definition looks good to me.
What got me wondering is how to manage references, such as your Wikipedia one. I may be unaware of it, but it is not defined yet how to deal with it. There are two groups of references: the See Also, to point to deeper content, and References / Citations, to point to the bases of a definition.
@PeerHerholz @htwangtw @complexbrains would the bibliography support from Jupyter Book be a good alternative?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks @r03ert0 ! I am happy with more new content added to the glossary!
@anibalsolon Re: referencing we don't have a system in place to handle them yet.
References / Citations, to point to the bases of a definition
... would the bibliography support from Jupyter Book be a good alternative?
This is a good idea! Seems not too difficult to do! It would be great if we can address this within this PR.
the See Also, to point to deeper content
This can be implemented through section labels and we have already implemented that for the manuscript referencing. The glossary page of the jupyterbook documentation actually is a very good example that we can follow and implement. We can have this implemented in a different PR, or this one. Even if we address this in a different PR, this is a good time to do it since we have only a few entries, it's quicker to make edits now and for newcomers they will have some examples to follow!
4 participants
Added definition of "unconference" from wikipedia, together with a link to the full article.