Relax local-mode PyPI requirements on urllib3

[knikure]

Issue #, if available:
#3857

Description of changes:
Relax local-mode PyPI requirements on urllib3 to a range urllib3>=1.26.8,<1.26.15
Testing done:

Merge Checklist

Put an x in the boxes that apply. You can also fill these out after creating the PR. If you're unsure about any of them, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! This is simply a reminder of what we are going to look for before merging your pull request.

General

• I have read the CONTRIBUTING doc
• I certify that the changes I am introducing will be backward compatible, and I have discussed concerns about this, if any, with the Python SDK team
• I used the commit message format described in CONTRIBUTING
• I have passed the region in to all S3 and STS clients that I've initialized as part of this change.
• I have updated any necessary documentation, including READMEs and API docs (if appropriate)

Tests

• I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works (if appropriate)
• I have added unit and/or integration tests as appropriate to ensure backward compatibility of the changes
• I have checked that my tests are not configured for a specific region or account (if appropriate)
• I have used unique_name_from_base to create resource names in integ tests (if appropriate)

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

[sagemaker-bot]

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

• CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-pr
• Commit ID: 72b8d9a
• Result: SUCCEEDED
• Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

[sagemaker-bot]

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

• CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-local-mode-tests
• Commit ID: 72b8d9a
• Result: SUCCEEDED
• Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

[sagemaker-bot]

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

• CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-notebook-tests
• Commit ID: 72b8d9a
• Result: FAILED
• Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

[sagemaker-bot]

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

• CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-unit-tests
• Commit ID: 72b8d9a
• Result: SUCCEEDED
• Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #3861 (e33b011) into master (ca2d1c1) will decrease coverage by 0.71%.
The diff coverage is 98.46%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3861      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   89.95%   89.25%   -0.71%     
==========================================
  Files        1140      267     -873     
  Lines      105316    26056   -79260     
==========================================
- Hits        94741    23255   -71486     
+ Misses      10575     2801    -7774     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/sagemaker/inputs.py	100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/sagemaker/remote_function/client.py	96.90% <ø> (ø)
...rc/sagemaker/remote_function/core/serialization.py	96.07% <97.67%> (ø)
src/sagemaker/experiments/run.py	99.14% <100.00%> (ø)
...ference_recommender/inference_recommender_mixin.py	95.00% <100.00%> (ø)
.../sagemaker/remote_function/core/stored_function.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/sagemaker/remote_function/errors.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/sagemaker/remote_function/invoke_function.py	77.35% <100.00%> (ø)
src/sagemaker/remote_function/job.py	88.93% <100.00%> (ø)

... and 1398 files with indirect coverage changes

[sagemaker-bot]

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

• CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-pr
• Commit ID: e33b011
• Result: SUCCEEDED
• Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

[sagemaker-bot]

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

• CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-local-mode-tests
• Commit ID: e33b011
• Result: SUCCEEDED
• Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

[sagemaker-bot]

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

• CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-notebook-tests
• Commit ID: e33b011
• Result: SUCCEEDED
• Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

[sagemaker-bot]

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

• CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-unit-tests
• Commit ID: e33b011
• Result: SUCCEEDED
• Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

[sagemaker-bot]

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

• CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-slow-tests
• Commit ID: e33b011
• Result: FAILED
• Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

[knikure]

/bot run slow-tests

[sagemaker-bot]

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

• CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-slow-tests
• Commit ID: e33b011
• Result: FAILED
• Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

[sagemaker-bot]

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

• CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-slow-tests
• Commit ID: e33b011
• Result: SUCCEEDED
• Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

[ozancaglayan]

Thanks! This could be <2.0.0 as well right? Is there a particular reason to avoid 1.26.15?