This repository was archived by the owner on Dec 15, 2022. It is now read-only.
GraphQL schema update #2154
Merged
GraphQL schema update #2154
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
github-actions
bot
added
the
schema update
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #2154 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 92.72% 92.72% +<.01%
==========================================
Files 215 215
Lines 12269 12269
Branches 1796 1796
==========================================
+ Hits 11376 11377 +1
+ Misses 893 892 -1
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
🤖 This automated pull request brought to you by a GitHub action 🤖
The GraphQL schema has been updated and
🚀
relay-compilerhas been re-run on the package source. The new schema has been committed to this branch and pushed. None of the generated Relay source has changed as a result, so this should be a trivial merge