Skip to content

Conversation

@jaybarden1
Copy link
Contributor

Almost certainly more tests required but, raising now to see how local stats compare to SonarQube...

jbarden added 3 commits July 26, 2025 21:34
get back to passing tests
It';'s quiet possible that the tests exist in the original project(s) but...
@jaybarden1 jaybarden1 requested a review from jbarden July 26, 2025 22:13
jbarden added 3 commits July 27, 2025 22:25
And add any missing ones / fix bugs in the original code
which triggered a few other code changes but, test-wise, it compiles and passes
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
0.0% Coverage on New Code (required ≥ 80%)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

Copy link
Contributor

@jbarden jbarden left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I feel your pain. Let's hope the build & SonarQube both work...

@jaybarden1 jaybarden1 merged commit 6ed5d6f into main Jul 27, 2025
2 of 3 checks passed
@jaybarden1 jaybarden1 deleted the features/continue-recreating-dbcontext-extensions branch July 27, 2025 21:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants