Skip to content

Conversation

per1234
Copy link
Contributor

@per1234 per1234 commented Dec 7, 2020

No description provided.

@per1234 per1234 requested review from rsora and silvanocerza December 7, 2020 10:30
Copy link
Contributor

@silvanocerza silvanocerza left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There are some small things to change but the rest if good

@per1234 per1234 force-pushed the per1234/add-checks branch from 56172b6 to 171133b Compare December 7, 2020 19:46
Previously, tests that needed a library without examples used a library that just happened to not have examples for test
data. Using test data specifically intended to provide the necessary conditions will result in less fragile tests.
If a file with one of the names supported by the licensee gem is in the root of the repository containing the text of a
standard license, GitHub recognizes the license type and enables some nice integrations. So having such a file is best
practices.

These checks are only for the presence of the file, rather than their contents.
This checks whether sketch.json is compliant with the expected data format.
@per1234 per1234 force-pushed the per1234/add-checks branch from 171133b to 0ebcb78 Compare December 9, 2020 04:51
@per1234 per1234 merged commit e48c2be into main Dec 10, 2020
@per1234 per1234 deleted the per1234/add-checks branch December 10, 2020 09:49
@per1234 per1234 added topic: code Related to content of the project itself type: enhancement Proposed improvement labels Sep 29, 2021
@per1234 per1234 self-assigned this Nov 20, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

topic: code Related to content of the project itself type: enhancement Proposed improvement

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants