Skip to content

Conversation

@hiletmis
Copy link
Contributor

@hiletmis hiletmis commented Aug 28, 2025

Related to https://github.com/api3dao/tasks/issues/1754, https://github.com/api3dao/tasks/issues/1755 and https://github.com/api3dao/data-feeds/issues/3329

  • hyperliquid explorer is etherscan but it support V2 API only so API information is not included in configuration. Contracts are verified manually.
  • The remaining chain in tasks above is still private and not included

@hiletmis hiletmis requested a review from bdrhn9 August 28, 2025 11:50
@hiletmis hiletmis marked this pull request as ready for review August 28, 2025 11:51
@hiletmis hiletmis requested a review from bbenligiray as a code owner August 28, 2025 11:51
Copy link
Member

@bbenligiray bbenligiray left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hyperliquid: A high-performance decentralized derivatives exchange built on its own Layer 1 blockchain, specializing in perpetual futures trading with no gas fees.
HyperEVM: Hyperliquid's Ethereum-compatible execution layer that allows developers to deploy Ethereum smart contracts on the Hyperliquid network.

The alias/name in the checklist was correct

@hiletmis
Copy link
Contributor Author

This topic was discussed on previous PR

That's why I preferred these over the checklist.

@bbenligiray
Copy link
Member

It's normal for branding to evolve towards launch. https://hyperevmscan.io/ is recent and indicates that they will call the chain HyperEVM. However, hyperliquid/hyperliquid-testnet are fine as aliases and the name changes are not breaking. I will die on another hill.

@bbenligiray bbenligiray self-requested a review August 28, 2025 16:26
@bbenligiray bbenligiray merged commit 5567641 into main Aug 28, 2025
3 of 4 checks passed
@bbenligiray bbenligiray deleted the Csur-2025-08-29 branch August 28, 2025 16:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants