Test failures in environment with Financial Force packages installed

[adtennant]

When deploying into a fresh developer edition, all tests pass and everything is hunky dory.

When deploying into an environment which has the followingFinancial Force packages installed (and no other Apex), SObjectSelectorTests fail.

• FinancialForce Expansion Pack (ffxp)
• FinancialForce QuickStart (ffqs)
• FinancialForce ClickLink (ffirule)
• FinancialForce Accounting (c2g)
• FinancialForce Reporting (ffr)
• FinancialForce Accounting Accounts Payable Extension (ffap)
• Basic SCM Reports
• FinancialForce Central (ffc)
• FinancialForce Journal Extension (ffgl)
• FinancialForce Cash Entry Extension (ffcash)
• FinancialForce VAT Reporting (ffvat)
• FinancialForce OneTouch (ffbext)
• SCM (SCMC)
• Declarative Lookup Rollup Summaries Tool (dlrs)
• FinancialForce Enquires
• FinancialForce Consulting Tools (ffct)

Test Failures

Class
fflib_SObjectSelectorTest
Method Name
testDefaultConfig
Pass/Fail
Fail
Error Message
System.AssertException: Assertion Failed: Expected: AccountNumber,AnnualRevenue,Id,Name, Actual: Name,AnnualRevenue,AccountNumber,Id
Stack Trace
Class.fflib_SObjectSelectorTest.testDefaultConfig: line 185, column 1

Class
fflib_SObjectSelectorTest
Method Name
testGetFieldListString
Pass/Fail
Fail
Error Message
System.AssertException: Assertion Failed: Expected: myprefix.AccountNumber,myprefix.AnnualRevenue,myprefix.Id,myprefix.Name, Actual: myprefix.AccountNumber,myprefix.Name,myprefix.Id,myprefix.AnnualRevenue
Stack Trace
Class.fflib_SObjectSelectorTest.testGetFieldListString: line 46, column 1

[adtennant]

PS. I wish these were global in c2g so I didn't have to have the same classes twice.

[adtennant]

I've not yet figured out why the above pull request resolves this issue, but it does. If I figure it out I will comment here.

[afawcett]

Yeah, i think as i've said in another comment, talking with @capeterson i think the use of fflib_QueryFactory in the new Selector base class is causing some instability in the tests, since QueryFactory is using Set's / Map's. We need to put some ordering into the fields emitted when the toSQL function is called.

[capeterson]

I have an open pull request on our internal git with a fix to make fflib_QueryFactory.toSOQL() deterministic. Once it makes it through code review we'll get it updated here.

[capeterson]

#30 should take care of this, although we might have to update the selector tests after it's applied since the deterministic ordering might be different than the previous ordering that happened to be dependent on how salesforce felt (feels?) like implementing the Set collection internally.

[rsoesemann]

Any updates on this? We really want to use the fflib packages but this makes them a risk for every release.

[tfuda]

I believe I have fixed this in pull request #33. Because the field collection is backed by a Set, the are returned in an unpredictable order. Since I don't believe there's any particular need to preserve the ordering of the fields in the generated SOQL, I fixed the test assertions to tolerate the fields coming back in any order.

[afawcett]

I've now merged PR 33, thanks.