Skip to content

Conversation

@rxin
Copy link
Contributor

@rxin rxin commented Nov 26, 2015

This is a followup for #9959.

I added more documentation and rewrote some monadic code into simpler ifs.

@rxin
Copy link
Contributor Author

rxin commented Nov 26, 2015

cc @davies

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Filter(stayUp) -> Aggregate -> Filter(pushDownPredicate)? the -> looks like "having a child" to me.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hm i'm going with how the data flows here.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok i changed the direction of the arrows and also moved the operators around.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Nov 26, 2015

Test build #46761 has finished for PR 9995 at commit fe3a9a4.

  • This patch fails Spark unit tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Nov 26, 2015

Test build #46775 has finished for PR 9995 at commit 95b2e0d.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@davies
Copy link
Contributor

davies commented Nov 27, 2015

LGTM

@asfgit asfgit closed this in de28e4d Nov 27, 2015
asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 27, 2015
This is a followup for #9959.

I added more documentation and rewrote some monadic code into simpler ifs.

Author: Reynold Xin <[email protected]>

Closes #9995 from rxin/SPARK-11973.

(cherry picked from commit de28e4d)
Signed-off-by: Reynold Xin <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants