Skip to content

[SPARK-11610][MLlib][Python][Docs] Make the docs of LDAModel.describeTopics in Python more specific #9577

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

[SPARK-11610][MLlib][Python][Docs] Make the docs of LDAModel.describeTopics in Python more specific #9577

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

@yu-iskw
Copy link
Contributor

@yu-iskw yu-iskw commented Nov 9, 2015

@yu-iskw yu-iskw mentioned this pull request Nov 9, 2015
Closed
@jkbradley
Copy link
Member

jkbradley commented Nov 10, 2015

Thanks! LGTM pending tests

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Nov 10, 2015

Test build #45441 has finished for PR 9577 at commit e07f118.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@jkbradley
Copy link
Member

jkbradley commented Nov 10, 2015

Merging with master and branch-1.6

asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 10, 2015
@yu-iskw @jkbradley
[SPARK-11610][MLLIB][PYTHON][DOCS] Make the docs of LDAModel.describe…
0825387 
…Topics in Python more specific

cc jkbradley

Author: Yu ISHIKAWA <[email protected]>

Closes #9577 from yu-iskw/SPARK-11610.

(cherry picked from commit 7dc9d8d)
Signed-off-by: Joseph K. Bradley <[email protected]>
@asfgit asfgit closed this in 7dc9d8d Nov 10, 2015
@yu-iskw
Copy link
Contributor Author

yu-iskw commented Nov 10, 2015

Thanks for merging it!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@yu-iskw @jkbradley @SparkQA