Skip to content

Conversation

@nssalian
Copy link

Issue link: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-9570

Previous PR: #8071
Changes made:

  1. Added the deploy-mode syntax in favor of yarn-cluster method of submission
    Requesting review.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

R/README.md Outdated
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since this is intended as a runnable snippet, I don't think you can write "cluster (or client)". I'd write "client". Elsewhere it's explained what this option's values are.

@nssalian
Copy link
Author

nssalian commented Sep 7, 2015

@srowen Thank you for the note. Will get it done asap.

@srowen
Copy link
Member

srowen commented Sep 19, 2015

@nssalian are you working on this one? you can close the PR if you're not going to proceed with this particular change. It would be great to get something like this merged.

@nssalian
Copy link
Author

@srowen thank you for the note. Haven't had a chance these past few weeks.
Should get it done today.

@nssalian
Copy link
Author

Corrected the nits. Will search the whole project for other places that I have missed.

@nssalian
Copy link
Author

That's pretty much all I could find. The rest seem to be code pointing to the option of using yarn-cluster, yarn-client and how Spark parses them.
Please let me know if I have missed anything. I went through the code looking for --master, yarn-client, yarn-cluster and deploy

R/README.md Outdated
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Here, I'd prefer showing just your new example where deploy-mode is explicit. Might as well set a good example.

@srowen
Copy link
Member

srowen commented Sep 21, 2015

This has a merge conflict now, sorry. It might be easier even to squash all your commits, then rebase, if you're up for it. In any event, it does just need a rebase on master and a force push.

@srowen
Copy link
Member

srowen commented Oct 1, 2015

@nssalian I'd like to resolve this at last. This has outstanding comments and needs a rebase. Do you want to do that or should I take over?

@nssalian
Copy link
Author

nssalian commented Oct 1, 2015

@srowen please go ahead.
Thank you.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

still using yarn-cluster instead of deploy-mode

@srowen
Copy link
Member

srowen commented Oct 2, 2015

See #8968 now. Do you mind closing this PR?

@nssalian
Copy link
Author

nssalian commented Oct 2, 2015

Closing in favor of #8968

@nssalian nssalian closed this Oct 2, 2015
asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 4, 2015
…ps to YARN, -master yarn --deploy-mode x vs -master yarn-x'.

Recommend `--master yarn --deploy-mode {cluster,client}` consistently in docs.
Follow-on to #8385
CC nssalian

Author: Sean Owen <[email protected]>

Closes #8968 from srowen/SPARK-9570.
kiszk pushed a commit to kiszk/spark-gpu that referenced this pull request Dec 26, 2015
…ps to YARN, -master yarn --deploy-mode x vs -master yarn-x'.

Recommend `--master yarn --deploy-mode {cluster,client}` consistently in docs.
Follow-on to apache/spark#8385
CC nssalian

Author: Sean Owen <[email protected]>

Closes #8968 from srowen/SPARK-9570.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants