-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28.9k
[SPARK-9372] [SQL] Filter nulls in join keys #7768
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
16 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
2201129
Filter out rows that will not be joined in equal joins early.
yhuai d5b84c3
Do not add unnessary filters.
yhuai 69bb072
Introduce NullSafeHashPartitioning and NullUnsafePartitioning.
yhuai 7c2d2d8
Bug fix and refactoring.
yhuai e616d3b
wip
yhuai c6667e7
Add PartitioningCollection.
yhuai f9516b0
Style
yhuai d3d2e64
First round of cleanup.
yhuai c57a954
Bug fix.
yhuai 40eeece
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into filter-nulls-in-joi…
JoshRosen 303236b
Revert changes that are unrelated to null join key filtering
JoshRosen 8bb39ad
Fix non-deterministic tests.
yhuai be88760
Make it clear that FilterNullsInJoinKeySuite.scala is used to test Fi…
yhuai ea7d5a6
Make sure we do not keep adding filters.
yhuai 0a8e096
Update comments.
yhuai c02fc3f
Address Josh's comments.
yhuai File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just to briefly clarify, I guess that the problem was that
AtLeastNNullsalso droppedNaNsbut that we can't do that since it would lead to a violation of our NaN-equality semantics when joining on float/double columns?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah. Because
nullmeansUnknown, so when you have a predicatenull = null, the result is false (meaningUnknown). But forNaN, in our current semantic, twoNaNare equal.