Skip to content

Conversation

@viirya
Copy link
Member

@viirya viirya commented Jul 24, 2015

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Incorrect comment.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I find the double-negation here to be a bit confusing. Could we remove a level of negation by using forall instead of exists and pushing the negation down?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks. Updated to make it more readable.

@JoshRosen
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for fixing this! I'm going to try out your patch on top of #7625, the fuzz testing tool that I used to find this bug.

@JoshRosen
Copy link
Contributor

Jenkins, retest this please.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jul 24, 2015

Test build #38369 has finished for PR 7645 at commit a240707.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@JoshRosen
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM.

@cloud-fan
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM

@JoshRosen
Copy link
Contributor

Jenkins, retest this please.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jul 26, 2015

Test build #38480 has finished for PR 7645 at commit a240707.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@JoshRosen
Copy link
Contributor

I'm going to merge this into master. Thanks!

@asfgit asfgit closed this in 945d8bc Jul 27, 2015
@viirya viirya deleted the smj_unsortable branch December 27, 2023 18:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants