-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28.9k
[SPARK-8297] [YARN] Scheduler backend is not notified in case node fails in YARN #7431
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
14 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
a3a0f01
Fix SPARK-8297
9ee1307
Fix SPARK-8297
bbf8811
Merge branch 'fix_yarn_scheduler_bug' of github.com:mridulm/spark int…
62ad0cc
Merge branch 'fix_yarn_scheduler_bug' of github.com:mridulm/spark int…
362d64a
Merge branch 'fix_yarn_scheduler_bug' of github.com:mridulm/spark int…
9218fcc
Fix failing testcase
e1b0067
Fix failing testcase, fix merge issue from our 1.3 -> master
687790f
Merge branch 'fix_yarn_scheduler_bug' of github.com:mridulm/spark int…
8855b97
Merge remote-tracking branch 'mridul/fix_yarn_scheduler_bug' into SPA…
04dc112
Use driver <-> AM communication to send "remove executor" request.
537da6f
Make an expected log less scary.
3b262e8
Merge branch 'master' into SPARK-8297
d4adf4e
Merge branch 'master' into SPARK-8297
471e4a0
Fix unit test after merge.
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
aren't we already in an
if (!alreadyReleased)up there? If I'm not wrong we don't need to check this here again.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
no it comes out of first if !alreadyReleased at line 423 of the diff (418 or original) if you expand. The diff here just makes it look like it