Skip to content

Conversation

@pwendell
Copy link
Contributor

Before diving into review #4450 I did a look through the existing shuffle
code to learn how it works. Unfortunately, there are some very
confusing things in this code. This patch makes a few small changes
to simplify things. It is not easily to concisely describe the changes
because of how convoluted the issues were, but they are fairly small
logically:

  1. There is a trait named ShuffleBlockManager that only deals with
    one logical function which is retrieving shuffle block data given shuffle
    block coordinates. This trait has two implementors FileShuffleBlockManager
    and IndexShuffleBlockManager. Confusingly the vast majority of those
    implementations have nothing to do with this particular functionality.
    So I've renamed the trait to ShuffleBlockResolver and documented it.
  2. The aforementioned trait had two almost identical methods, for no good
    reason. I removed one method (getBytes) and modified callers to use the
    other one. I think the behavior is preserved in all cases.
  3. The sort shuffle code uses an identifier "0" in the reduce slot of a
    BlockID as a placeholder. I made it into a constant since it needs to
    be consistent across multiple places.

I think for (3) there is actually a better solution that would avoid the
need to do this type of workaround/hack in the first place, but it's more
complex so I'm punting it for now.

Before diving into review apache#4450 I did a look through the existing shuffle
code. Unfortunately, there are some very confusing things in this code.
This patch makes a few small changes to simplify things. It is not easily
to concisely describe the changes because of how convoluted the issues were:

1. There was a trait named ShuffleBlockManager that only deals with
   one logical function which is retrieving shuffle block data given shuffle
   block coordinates. This trait has two implementors FileShuffleBlockManager
   and IndexShuffleBlockManager. Confusingly the vast majority of those
   implementations have nothing to do with this particular functionality.
   So I've renamed the trait to ShuffleBlockResolver and documented it.
2. The aformentioned trait had two almost identical methods, for no good
   reason. I removed one method (getBytes) and modified callers to use the
   other one. I think the behavior is preserved in all cases.
3. The sort shuffle code uses an identifier "0" in the reduce slot of a
   BlockID as a placeholder. I made it into a constant since it needs to
   be consistent across multiple places.

I think for (3) there is actually a better solution that would avoid the
need to do this type of workaround/hack in the first place, but it's more
complex so I'm punting it for now.
@pwendell
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cc @aarondav and @rxin, with whom I discussed some of the existing design. And @sryza who recently looked a lot at this code.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Mar 31, 2015

Test build #29456 has started for PR 5286 at commit a406079.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This behavior is kind of lame (just wrapping this in a Some), but it preserves what was there before.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can you change Some -> Option, just in case nioByteBuffer returns null?

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Mar 31, 2015

Test build #29456 has finished for PR 5286 at commit a406079.

  • This patch fails Scala style tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.
  • This patch does not change any dependencies.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29456/
Test FAILed.

@rxin
Copy link
Contributor

rxin commented Mar 31, 2015

Why is this a HOTFIX?

@pwendell
Copy link
Contributor Author

We have to put that whenever we don't create a JIRA or else the scripts we use get messed up. I can just make a JIRA for the overall clean-up.

@rxin
Copy link
Contributor

rxin commented Mar 31, 2015

At a high level LGTM

@pwendell pwendell changed the title [HOTFIX] Some clean-up in shuffle code. [SPARK-6627] Some clean-up in shuffle code. Mar 31, 2015
@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Mar 31, 2015

Test build #29458 has started for PR 5286 at commit d1c0494.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Mar 31, 2015

Test build #29458 has finished for PR 5286 at commit d1c0494.

  • This patch fails Spark unit tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.
  • This patch does not change any dependencies.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29458/
Test FAILed.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please continue

@aarondav
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM too

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Mar 31, 2015

Test build #29491 has started for PR 5286 at commit f36edd5.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Mar 31, 2015

Test build #29491 has finished for PR 5286 at commit f36edd5.

  • This patch fails Spark unit tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.
  • This patch does not change any dependencies.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29491/
Test FAILed.

@pwendell
Copy link
Contributor Author

Jenkins, retest this pleas.e

@pwendell
Copy link
Contributor Author

pwendell commented Apr 1, 2015

Jenkins, retest this please.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Apr 1, 2015

Test build #29576 has started for PR 5286 at commit f36edd5.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Apr 2, 2015

Test build #29576 has finished for PR 5286 at commit f36edd5.

  • This patch fails Spark unit tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.
  • This patch removes the following dependencies:
    • RoaringBitmap-0.4.5.jar
    • activation-1.1.jar
    • akka-actor_2.10-2.3.4-spark.jar
    • akka-remote_2.10-2.3.4-spark.jar
    • akka-slf4j_2.10-2.3.4-spark.jar
    • aopalliance-1.0.jar
    • arpack_combined_all-0.1.jar
    • avro-1.7.7.jar
    • breeze-macros_2.10-0.11.2.jar
    • breeze_2.10-0.11.2.jar
    • chill-java-0.5.0.jar
    • chill_2.10-0.5.0.jar
    • commons-beanutils-1.7.0.jar
    • commons-beanutils-core-1.8.0.jar
    • commons-cli-1.2.jar
    • commons-codec-1.10.jar
    • commons-collections-3.2.1.jar
    • commons-compress-1.4.1.jar
    • commons-configuration-1.6.jar
    • commons-digester-1.8.jar
    • commons-httpclient-3.1.jar
    • commons-io-2.1.jar
    • commons-lang-2.5.jar
    • commons-lang3-3.3.2.jar
    • commons-math-2.1.jar
    • commons-math3-3.1.1.jar
    • commons-net-2.2.jar
    • compress-lzf-1.0.0.jar
    • config-1.2.1.jar
    • core-1.1.2.jar
    • curator-client-2.4.0.jar
    • curator-framework-2.4.0.jar
    • curator-recipes-2.4.0.jar
    • gmbal-api-only-3.0.0-b023.jar
    • grizzly-framework-2.1.2.jar
    • grizzly-http-2.1.2.jar
    • grizzly-http-server-2.1.2.jar
    • grizzly-http-servlet-2.1.2.jar
    • grizzly-rcm-2.1.2.jar
    • groovy-all-2.3.7.jar
    • guava-14.0.1.jar
    • guice-3.0.jar
    • hadoop-annotations-2.2.0.jar
    • hadoop-auth-2.2.0.jar
    • hadoop-client-2.2.0.jar
    • hadoop-common-2.2.0.jar
    • hadoop-hdfs-2.2.0.jar
    • hadoop-mapreduce-client-app-2.2.0.jar
    • hadoop-mapreduce-client-common-2.2.0.jar
    • hadoop-mapreduce-client-core-2.2.0.jar
    • hadoop-mapreduce-client-jobclient-2.2.0.jar
    • hadoop-mapreduce-client-shuffle-2.2.0.jar
    • hadoop-yarn-api-2.2.0.jar
    • hadoop-yarn-client-2.2.0.jar
    • hadoop-yarn-common-2.2.0.jar
    • hadoop-yarn-server-common-2.2.0.jar
    • ivy-2.4.0.jar
    • jackson-annotations-2.4.0.jar
    • jackson-core-2.4.4.jar
    • jackson-core-asl-1.8.8.jar
    • jackson-databind-2.4.4.jar
    • jackson-jaxrs-1.8.8.jar
    • jackson-mapper-asl-1.8.8.jar
    • jackson-module-scala_2.10-2.4.4.jar
    • jackson-xc-1.8.8.jar
    • jansi-1.4.jar
    • javax.inject-1.jar
    • javax.servlet-3.0.0.v201112011016.jar
    • javax.servlet-3.1.jar
    • javax.servlet-api-3.0.1.jar
    • jaxb-api-2.2.2.jar
    • jaxb-impl-2.2.3-1.jar
    • jcl-over-slf4j-1.7.10.jar
    • jersey-client-1.9.jar
    • jersey-core-1.9.jar
    • jersey-grizzly2-1.9.jar
    • jersey-guice-1.9.jar
    • jersey-json-1.9.jar
    • jersey-server-1.9.jar
    • jersey-test-framework-core-1.9.jar
    • jersey-test-framework-grizzly2-1.9.jar
    • jets3t-0.7.1.jar
    • jettison-1.1.jar
    • jetty-util-6.1.26.jar
    • jline-0.9.94.jar
    • jline-2.10.4.jar
    • jodd-core-3.6.3.jar
    • json4s-ast_2.10-3.2.10.jar
    • json4s-core_2.10-3.2.10.jar
    • json4s-jackson_2.10-3.2.10.jar
    • jsr305-1.3.9.jar
    • jtransforms-2.4.0.jar
    • jul-to-slf4j-1.7.10.jar
    • kryo-2.21.jar
    • log4j-1.2.17.jar
    • lz4-1.2.0.jar
    • management-api-3.0.0-b012.jar
    • mesos-0.21.0-shaded-protobuf.jar
    • metrics-core-3.1.0.jar
    • metrics-graphite-3.1.0.jar
    • metrics-json-3.1.0.jar
    • metrics-jvm-3.1.0.jar
    • minlog-1.2.jar
    • netty-3.8.0.Final.jar
    • netty-all-4.0.23.Final.jar
    • objenesis-1.2.jar
    • opencsv-2.3.jar
    • oro-2.0.8.jar
    • paranamer-2.6.jar
    • parquet-column-1.6.0rc3.jar
    • parquet-common-1.6.0rc3.jar
    • parquet-encoding-1.6.0rc3.jar
    • parquet-format-2.2.0-rc1.jar
    • parquet-generator-1.6.0rc3.jar
    • parquet-hadoop-1.6.0rc3.jar
    • parquet-jackson-1.6.0rc3.jar
    • protobuf-java-2.4.1.jar
    • protobuf-java-2.5.0-spark.jar
    • py4j-0.8.2.1.jar
    • pyrolite-2.0.1.jar
    • quasiquotes_2.10-2.0.1.jar
    • reflectasm-1.07-shaded.jar
    • scala-compiler-2.10.4.jar
    • scala-library-2.10.4.jar
    • scala-reflect-2.10.4.jar
    • scalap-2.10.4.jar
    • scalatest_2.10-2.2.1.jar
    • slf4j-api-1.7.10.jar
    • slf4j-log4j12-1.7.10.jar
    • snappy-java-1.1.1.6.jar
    • spark-bagel_2.10-1.4.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
    • spark-catalyst_2.10-1.4.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
    • spark-core_2.10-1.4.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
    • spark-graphx_2.10-1.4.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
    • spark-launcher_2.10-1.4.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
    • spark-mllib_2.10-1.4.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
    • spark-network-common_2.10-1.4.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
    • spark-network-shuffle_2.10-1.4.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
    • spark-repl_2.10-1.4.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
    • spark-sql_2.10-1.4.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
    • spark-streaming_2.10-1.4.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
    • spire-macros_2.10-0.7.4.jar
    • spire_2.10-0.7.4.jar
    • stax-api-1.0.1.jar
    • stream-2.7.0.jar
    • tachyon-0.5.0.jar
    • tachyon-client-0.5.0.jar
    • uncommons-maths-1.2.2a.jar
    • unused-1.0.0.jar
    • xmlenc-0.52.jar
    • xz-1.0.jar
    • zookeeper-3.4.5.jar

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29576/
Test FAILed.

@pwendell
Copy link
Contributor Author

pwendell commented Apr 2, 2015

Jenkins, retest this please.

@pwendell
Copy link
Contributor Author

pwendell commented Apr 2, 2015

/cc @brennonyork - this is giving me strange dependency messages even though the patch doesn't touch any pom files.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Apr 2, 2015

Test build #29585 has started for PR 5286 at commit c71fbc7.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Apr 2, 2015

Test build #29585 has finished for PR 5286 at commit c71fbc7.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.
  • This patch does not change any dependencies.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29585/
Test PASSed.

@asfgit asfgit closed this in 6562787 Apr 2, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants