Skip to content

Conversation

pjfanning
Copy link
Member

@pjfanning pjfanning commented Jun 30, 2025

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

JsonProtocol tidy up. Only parse JSON relating to Spark events.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-52381

Why are the changes needed?

Tidier code and https://lists.apache.org/thread/9zwkdo85wcdfppgqvbhjly8wdgf595yp

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No

How was this patch tested?

Unit test

Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?

No

…kListenerEvent

JsonProtocol tidy up. Only parse JSON relating to Spark events.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-52381

Tidier code and https://lists.apache.org/thread/9zwkdo85wcdfppgqvbhjly8wdgf595yp

No

Unit test

No

Closes apache#51312 from pjfanning/SPARK-52381-br4.0.

Authored-by: PJ Fanning <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: yangjie01 <[email protected]>
@github-actions github-actions bot added the CORE label Jun 30, 2025
@pjfanning
Copy link
Member Author

fyi @LuciferYang - this is the last branch that I will copy this to

LuciferYang pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 30, 2025
…kListenerEvent

### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

JsonProtocol tidy up. Only parse JSON relating to Spark events.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-52381

### Why are the changes needed?

Tidier code and https://lists.apache.org/thread/9zwkdo85wcdfppgqvbhjly8wdgf595yp

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No

### How was this patch tested?

Unit test

### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?

No

Closes #51323 from pjfanning/SPARK-52381-br3.5.

Authored-by: PJ Fanning <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: yangjie01 <[email protected]>
@LuciferYang
Copy link
Contributor

Merged into branch-3.5. Thank you @prabeesh

@pjfanning pjfanning deleted the SPARK-52381-br3.5 branch July 3, 2025 09:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants