Skip to content

Conversation

@uros-db
Copy link
Contributor

@uros-db uros-db commented Jun 19, 2024

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Re-running the collation benchmark with two modifications:

Why are the changes needed?

We've changed the meaning of LCASE collation in Spark, and also modified how equality checks / hashing/ expressions work with this collation, so we need to re-run the benchmarks and identify areas of improvement.

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No.

How was this patch tested?

Existing tests.

Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?

No.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the SQL label Jun 19, 2024
Copy link
Contributor Author

@uros-db uros-db left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

adding @mkaravel to review

@uros-db
Copy link
Contributor Author

uros-db commented Jun 20, 2024

also adding @dbatomic and @cloud-fan to review

@cloud-fan cloud-fan changed the title [SQL] Re-run collation benchmark [SQL][TEST] Re-run collation benchmark Jun 21, 2024
@cloud-fan
Copy link
Contributor

thanks, merging to master!

@cloud-fan cloud-fan closed this in 6eb7978 Jun 21, 2024
cloud-fan pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 24, 2024
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Following up on #47030, re-running the collation benchmark for NonASCII.

### Why are the changes needed?
We've changed the meaning of LCASE collation in Spark, and also modified how equality checks / hashing/ expressions work with this collation, so we need to re-run the benchmarks and identify areas of improvement.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.

### How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.

### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
No.

Closes #47054 from uros-db/collation-benchmarks-nonascii.

Authored-by: Uros Bojanic <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants