Skip to content

[SPARK-5620][DOC] group methods in generated unidoc #4404

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

[SPARK-5620][DOC] group methods in generated unidoc #4404

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

@mengxr
Copy link
Contributor

@mengxr mengxr commented Feb 5, 2015

It seems that (ScalaUnidoc, unidoc) is the correct way to overwrite scalacOptions in unidoc.

CC: @rxin @gzm0

@rxin
Copy link
Contributor

rxin commented Feb 5, 2015

lgtm this is amazing. maybe the most important commit in 1.3.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Feb 5, 2015

Test build #26860 has started for PR 4404 at commit f890cf5.

  • This patch merges cleanly.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Feb 5, 2015

Test build #26860 has finished for PR 4404 at commit f890cf5.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

AmplabJenkins commented Feb 5, 2015

Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26860/
Test PASSed.

asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 6, 2015
@mengxr @rxin
[SPARK-5620][DOC] group methods in generated unidoc
e2be79d 
It seems that `(ScalaUnidoc, unidoc)` is the correct way to overwrite `scalacOptions` in unidoc.

CC: rxin gzm0

Author: Xiangrui Meng <[email protected]>

Closes #4404 from mengxr/SPARK-5620 and squashes the following commits:

f890cf5 [Xiangrui Meng] add -groups to scalacOptions in unidoc

(cherry picked from commit 85ccee8)
Signed-off-by: Reynold Xin <[email protected]>
@asfgit asfgit closed this in 85ccee8 Feb 6, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@mengxr @rxin @SparkQA @AmplabJenkins