Skip to content

Conversation

@marmbrus
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@marmbrus
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cc @liancheng

I'm going to merge this to keep other PRs from failing, but please review to make sure I fixed this correctly.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Dec 17, 2014

Test build #24558 has started for PR 3727 at commit 2157bfc.

  • This patch merges cleanly.

@asfgit asfgit closed this in 19c0faa Dec 17, 2014
@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Dec 17, 2014

Test build #24558 has finished for PR 3727 at commit 2157bfc.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24558/
Test PASSed.

@liancheng
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for helping fixing this. I should have pointed out that #3644 and #3367 conflict to each other since the latter recognizes more filter expressions.

@marmbrus marmbrus deleted the parquetNotEq branch March 9, 2015 20:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants