Skip to content

[SPARK-4753][SQL] Use catalyst for partition pruning in newParquet. #3613

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

[SPARK-4753][SQL] Use catalyst for partition pruning in newParquet. #3613

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

@marmbrus
Copy link
Contributor

@marmbrus marmbrus commented Dec 5, 2014

No description provided.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

AmplabJenkins commented Dec 5, 2014

Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24161/
Test FAILed.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Dec 5, 2014

Test build #540 has started for PR 3613 at commit 4f138f8.

  • This patch merges cleanly.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Dec 5, 2014

Test build #540 has finished for PR 3613 at commit 4f138f8.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@pwendell
Copy link
Contributor

pwendell commented Dec 5, 2014

Pulling this in per discussion with @marmbrus

asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2014
@marmbrus @pwendell
[SPARK-4753][SQL] Use catalyst for partition pruning in newParquet.
d12ea49 
Author: Michael Armbrust <[email protected]>

Closes #3613 from marmbrus/parquetPartitionPruning and squashes the following commits:

4f138f8 [Michael Armbrust] Use catalyst for partition pruning in newParquet.

(cherry picked from commit f5801e8)
Signed-off-by: Patrick Wendell <[email protected]>
@asfgit asfgit closed this in f5801e8 Dec 5, 2014
@marmbrus marmbrus deleted the parquetPartitionPruning branch February 17, 2015 20:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@marmbrus @AmplabJenkins @SparkQA @pwendell