[SPARK-37829][SQL] DataFrame.joinWith should return null rows for missing values #35140
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…sion" This reverts commit cd92f25.
|
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Member
|
cc @cloud-fan @viirya FYI |
Member
Author
|
@gengliangwang both PRs solve SPARK-37829 in the same way. Only one PR should be picked (up to the maintainers). The difference is that this one solves it by completely reverting the commit that introduced the bug, while the other keeps the current version of the code but fixes it to resolve the bug. |
|
We're closing this PR because it hasn't been updated in a while. This isn't a judgement on the merit of the PR in any way. It's just a way of keeping the PR queue manageable. |
cloud-fan
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 19, 2023
… value for unmatched row ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? When doing an outer join with joinWith on DataFrames, unmatched rows return Row objects with null fields instead of a single null value. This is not a expected behavior, and it's a regression introduced in [this commit](cd92f25). This pull request aims to fix the regression, note this is not a full rollback of the commit, do not add back "schema" variable. ``` case class ClassData(a: String, b: Int) val left = Seq(ClassData("a", 1), ClassData("b", 2)).toDF val right = Seq(ClassData("x", 2), ClassData("y", 3)).toDF left.joinWith(right, left("b") === right("b"), "left_outer").collect ``` ``` Wrong results (current behavior): Array(([a,1],[null,null]), ([b,2],[x,2])) Correct results: Array(([a,1],null), ([b,2],[x,2])) ``` ### Why are the changes needed? We need to address the regression mentioned above. It results in unexpected behavior changes in the Dataframe joinWith API between versions 2.4.8 and 3.0.0+. This could potentially cause data correctness issues for users who expect the old behavior when using Spark 3.0.0+. ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No ### How was this patch tested? Added unit test (use the same test in previous [closed pull request](#35140), credit to Clément de Groc) Run sql-core and sql-catalyst submodules locally with ./build/mvn clean package -pl sql/core,sql/catalyst Closes #40755 from kings129/encoder_bug_fix. Authored-by: --global <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <[email protected]>
cloud-fan
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 19, 2023
… value for unmatched row ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? When doing an outer join with joinWith on DataFrames, unmatched rows return Row objects with null fields instead of a single null value. This is not a expected behavior, and it's a regression introduced in [this commit](cd92f25). This pull request aims to fix the regression, note this is not a full rollback of the commit, do not add back "schema" variable. ``` case class ClassData(a: String, b: Int) val left = Seq(ClassData("a", 1), ClassData("b", 2)).toDF val right = Seq(ClassData("x", 2), ClassData("y", 3)).toDF left.joinWith(right, left("b") === right("b"), "left_outer").collect ``` ``` Wrong results (current behavior): Array(([a,1],[null,null]), ([b,2],[x,2])) Correct results: Array(([a,1],null), ([b,2],[x,2])) ``` ### Why are the changes needed? We need to address the regression mentioned above. It results in unexpected behavior changes in the Dataframe joinWith API between versions 2.4.8 and 3.0.0+. This could potentially cause data correctness issues for users who expect the old behavior when using Spark 3.0.0+. ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No ### How was this patch tested? Added unit test (use the same test in previous [closed pull request](#35140), credit to Clément de Groc) Run sql-core and sql-catalyst submodules locally with ./build/mvn clean package -pl sql/core,sql/catalyst Closes #40755 from kings129/encoder_bug_fix. Authored-by: --global <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit 74ce620) Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <[email protected]>
kings129
added a commit
to kings129/spark
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 19, 2023
… value for unmatched row ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? When doing an outer join with joinWith on DataFrames, unmatched rows return Row objects with null fields instead of a single null value. This is not a expected behavior, and it's a regression introduced in [this commit](apache@cd92f25). This pull request aims to fix the regression, note this is not a full rollback of the commit, do not add back "schema" variable. ``` case class ClassData(a: String, b: Int) val left = Seq(ClassData("a", 1), ClassData("b", 2)).toDF val right = Seq(ClassData("x", 2), ClassData("y", 3)).toDF left.joinWith(right, left("b") === right("b"), "left_outer").collect ``` ``` Wrong results (current behavior): Array(([a,1],[null,null]), ([b,2],[x,2])) Correct results: Array(([a,1],null), ([b,2],[x,2])) ``` ### Why are the changes needed? We need to address the regression mentioned above. It results in unexpected behavior changes in the Dataframe joinWith API between versions 2.4.8 and 3.0.0+. This could potentially cause data correctness issues for users who expect the old behavior when using Spark 3.0.0+. ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No ### How was this patch tested? Added unit test (use the same test in previous [closed pull request](apache#35140), credit to Clément de Groc) Run sql-core and sql-catalyst submodules locally with ./build/mvn clean package -pl sql/core,sql/catalyst Closes apache#40755 from kings129/encoder_bug_fix. Authored-by: --global <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <[email protected]>
dongjoon-hyun
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 7, 2023
… null value for unmatched row ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This is a pull request to port the fix from the master branch to version 3.3. [PR](#40755) When doing an outer join with joinWith on DataFrames, unmatched rows return Row objects with null fields instead of a single null value. This is not a expected behavior, and it's a regression introduced in [this commit](cd92f25). This pull request aims to fix the regression, note this is not a full rollback of the commit, do not add back "schema" variable. ``` case class ClassData(a: String, b: Int) val left = Seq(ClassData("a", 1), ClassData("b", 2)).toDF val right = Seq(ClassData("x", 2), ClassData("y", 3)).toDF left.joinWith(right, left("b") === right("b"), "left_outer").collect ``` ``` Wrong results (current behavior): Array(([a,1],[null,null]), ([b,2],[x,2])) Correct results: Array(([a,1],null), ([b,2],[x,2])) ``` ### Why are the changes needed? We need to address the regression mentioned above. It results in unexpected behavior changes in the Dataframe joinWith API between versions 2.4.8 and 3.0.0+. This could potentially cause data correctness issues for users who expect the old behavior when using Spark 3.0.0+. ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No ### How was this patch tested? Added unit test (use the same test in previous [closed pull request](#35140), credit to Clément de Groc) Run sql-core and sql-catalyst submodules locally with ./build/mvn clean package -pl sql/core,sql/catalyst Closes #40755 from kings129/encoder_bug_fix. Authored-by: --global <xuqiang129gmail.com> Closes #40858 from kings129/fix_encoder_branch_33. Authored-by: --global <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]>
snmvaughan
pushed a commit
to snmvaughan/spark
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 20, 2023
… value for unmatched row ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? When doing an outer join with joinWith on DataFrames, unmatched rows return Row objects with null fields instead of a single null value. This is not a expected behavior, and it's a regression introduced in [this commit](apache@cd92f25). This pull request aims to fix the regression, note this is not a full rollback of the commit, do not add back "schema" variable. ``` case class ClassData(a: String, b: Int) val left = Seq(ClassData("a", 1), ClassData("b", 2)).toDF val right = Seq(ClassData("x", 2), ClassData("y", 3)).toDF left.joinWith(right, left("b") === right("b"), "left_outer").collect ``` ``` Wrong results (current behavior): Array(([a,1],[null,null]), ([b,2],[x,2])) Correct results: Array(([a,1],null), ([b,2],[x,2])) ``` ### Why are the changes needed? We need to address the regression mentioned above. It results in unexpected behavior changes in the Dataframe joinWith API between versions 2.4.8 and 3.0.0+. This could potentially cause data correctness issues for users who expect the old behavior when using Spark 3.0.0+. ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No ### How was this patch tested? Added unit test (use the same test in previous [closed pull request](apache#35140), credit to Clément de Groc) Run sql-core and sql-catalyst submodules locally with ./build/mvn clean package -pl sql/core,sql/catalyst Closes apache#40755 from kings129/encoder_bug_fix. Authored-by: --global <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit 74ce620) Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <[email protected]>
GladwinLee
pushed a commit
to lyft/spark
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 10, 2023
… value for unmatched row ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? When doing an outer join with joinWith on DataFrames, unmatched rows return Row objects with null fields instead of a single null value. This is not a expected behavior, and it's a regression introduced in [this commit](apache@cd92f25). This pull request aims to fix the regression, note this is not a full rollback of the commit, do not add back "schema" variable. ``` case class ClassData(a: String, b: Int) val left = Seq(ClassData("a", 1), ClassData("b", 2)).toDF val right = Seq(ClassData("x", 2), ClassData("y", 3)).toDF left.joinWith(right, left("b") === right("b"), "left_outer").collect ``` ``` Wrong results (current behavior): Array(([a,1],[null,null]), ([b,2],[x,2])) Correct results: Array(([a,1],null), ([b,2],[x,2])) ``` ### Why are the changes needed? We need to address the regression mentioned above. It results in unexpected behavior changes in the Dataframe joinWith API between versions 2.4.8 and 3.0.0+. This could potentially cause data correctness issues for users who expect the old behavior when using Spark 3.0.0+. ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No ### How was this patch tested? Added unit test (use the same test in previous [closed pull request](apache#35140), credit to Clément de Groc) Run sql-core and sql-catalyst submodules locally with ./build/mvn clean package -pl sql/core,sql/catalyst Closes apache#40755 from kings129/encoder_bug_fix. Authored-by: --global <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit 74ce620) Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <[email protected]>
catalinii
pushed a commit
to lyft/spark
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 10, 2023
… value for unmatched row ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? When doing an outer join with joinWith on DataFrames, unmatched rows return Row objects with null fields instead of a single null value. This is not a expected behavior, and it's a regression introduced in [this commit](apache@cd92f25). This pull request aims to fix the regression, note this is not a full rollback of the commit, do not add back "schema" variable. ``` case class ClassData(a: String, b: Int) val left = Seq(ClassData("a", 1), ClassData("b", 2)).toDF val right = Seq(ClassData("x", 2), ClassData("y", 3)).toDF left.joinWith(right, left("b") === right("b"), "left_outer").collect ``` ``` Wrong results (current behavior): Array(([a,1],[null,null]), ([b,2],[x,2])) Correct results: Array(([a,1],null), ([b,2],[x,2])) ``` ### Why are the changes needed? We need to address the regression mentioned above. It results in unexpected behavior changes in the Dataframe joinWith API between versions 2.4.8 and 3.0.0+. This could potentially cause data correctness issues for users who expect the old behavior when using Spark 3.0.0+. ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No ### How was this patch tested? Added unit test (use the same test in previous [closed pull request](apache#35140), credit to Clément de Groc) Run sql-core and sql-catalyst submodules locally with ./build/mvn clean package -pl sql/core,sql/catalyst Closes apache#40755 from kings129/encoder_bug_fix. Authored-by: --global <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit 74ce620) Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add a unit test demonstrating the regression on
DataFrame.joinWith.Revert commit cd92f25be5a221e0d4618925f7bc9dfd3bb8cb59 making the test pass.
Why are the changes needed?
Doing an outer-join using joinWith on DataFrames used to return missing values as null in Spark 2.4.8, but returns them as Rows with null values in Spark 3.0.0+.
The regression has been introduced in commit cd92f25be5a221e0d4618925f7bc9dfd3bb8cb59.
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
How was this patch tested?
A unit test was added.
Ran unit tests for the
sql-coreandsql-catalystsubmodules with./build/mvn clean package -pl sql/core,cql/catalyst